LAW ON PUBLIC INTEGRITY

The Law on Public Integrity (“LOIP”), published in the Official Register Third Supplement No. 68 on June 26, 2025, amends several legal frameworks. Below is a summary of the reforms in tax, financial, and public procurement matters.

 

Tax

 

  1. A remission of interest, fines, costs, and surcharges is established on the full or partial payment of tax obligations generated up to December 31, 2024. Payment must be made by December 31, 2025. This measure applies to taxes administered by the Internal Revenue Service (SRI), except for income tax corresponding to fiscal year 2024.

 

2. Interest paid in tax refund procedures will accrue from the date the request is submitted until its resolution. The interest rate is reduced to 50% of the 90-day benchmark lending rate set by the Central Bank of Ecuador, compared to 100% prior to the reform.

 

3. If the tax authority initiates a determination process within the framework of an administrative refund claim, the duration of that process will not be considered for the calculation of interest.

 

Financial

 

  1. The Financial Policy and Regulation Board and the Monetary Policy and Regulation Board are merged into the new Monetary and Financial Policy and Regulation Board (JPRMF).

 

2. The JPRMF’s main responsibilities include the development of monetary, credit, financial, securities, insurance, and prepaid healthcare policy and regulation.

 

3. Within 90 days of its formation, the JPRMF must identify savings and credit cooperatives that must be transformed into private financial sector corporations, which will then fall under the supervision of the Superintendence of Banks.

 

Public Procurement

  1. The principle of best value for money is incorporated into public procurement.

 

2. The acquisition of medicines, strategic goods, and related services by entities providing healthcare services will be carried out under a special regime. Previously, related services were not included under this regime.

 

3. Maintaining outstanding obligations with the SRI or entities with coercive powers is now grounds for suspension of the RUP (Unified Registry of Suppliers).

 

4. During the preparatory phase of procurement processes, contracting entities may conduct preliminary market consultations. Participation in these consultations will not preclude suppliers from participating in the pre-contractual phase.

 

5. Consulting services will be contracted through a public tender when the reference budget exceeds US$10,000. If equal to or less, they may be contracted through direct contracting.

 

6. SERCOP may authorize purchases outside the electronic catalog if two conditions are met: (i) the external supplier offers the same standards and conditions as catalog suppliers; and (ii) the price is at least 5% lower than the catalog price.

 

7. The contract administrator will be responsible for processing and following up on payments to the contractor. If the contracting entity unjustifiably delays payment, it may not require the contractor to comply with or advance contract execution.

 

8. At any stage of execution, contracting entities must respond to contractor requests or petitions within the timeframe set in the contract, which may not exceed 10 business days.

 

9. Construction contracts must include a clause for the immediate replacement of the inspector if they fail to perform their duties.

 

10. Penalties for delays will be calculated per day on the unfulfilled obligation, according to parameters to be established in the LOSNCP regulations. The entity may set a maximum penalty percentage.

 

11. Before final payment or settlement, the contracting entity will offset amounts owed with firm debts owed to the Office of the Comptroller General. This does not apply if the debts are under administrative or judicial appeal.

 

12. Procedures, claims, and contracts initiated before June 26, 2025, will be governed by the rules in force at the time of their initiation, filing, or execution, respectively.

 

13. The President must issue the new LOSNCP regulations by August 10, 2025.

 

 

Andrea Moya, Partner at CorralRosales
amoya@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

Juan Fernando Riera, Associate at CorralRosales
jriera@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

Mario Fernandez, Associate at CorralRosales
mfernandez@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

© CORRALROSALES 2024
NOTA: EL texto anterior ha sido elaborado con fines informativos. CorralRosales no es responsable de ninguna pérdida o daño ocasionado como consecuencia de haberse actuado o dejado de actuar en base a la información contenida en este documento. Cualquier situación determinada adicional requiere la opinión y concepto específico de la firma.

CORRALROSALES

REGULATORY CHANGES IN THE MINING CONTROL FRAMEWORK

 

The Board of Directors of the Mining Regulation and Control Agency (“ARCOM”), through Resolutions No. ARCOM-002/25, No. ARCOM-004/25, and No. ARCOM-005/25 has amended the regulations governing control and oversight in the mining sector.

 

These reforms aim to address key challenges in the mining industry, particularly regarding transparency, traceability, and efficiency in administrative processes. They also establish the requirements, documentation, and procedures necessary to obtain the “Certificate of Export of Mining Products,” which is required for the legal export of metallic and non-metallic minerals by small-, medium-, and large-scale mining operations in Ecuador.

 

Below is a summary of the most important changes introduced by the three resolutions:

 

Resolution No. ARCOM-002/25 – INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE MINING REGISTRY OF THE MINING REGULATION AND CONTROL AGENCY

 

  1. Technological modernization of the registry. All registrations must be carried out through standardized technological systems, according to the guidelines set by the Ministry of Telecommunications.

 

  1. Designation of registry officers in each District Directorate. Each office must have qualified personnel legally responsible for processing registrations. These officers must meet specific requirements (law degree, 3 years of experience, Ecuadorian nationality).

 

  1. Strict deadlines and accountability. Registry officers will have three (3) days to process applications. Failure to do so without justification will trigger disciplinary proceedings.

 

  1. Creation of the Digital Record Book. This electronic book will be the sole valid method to log applications, replacing physical records. ARCOM will soon publish a Methodological Guide for its use.

 

  1. Detailed contents of the new Mining Registry. The updated registry must include:

 

  1. Concessions, amendments, objections, and relinquishments.
  2. Suspensions, expirations, and nullifications.
  3. Licenses for mineral trading and export.
  4. Authorizations for processing and beneficiation plants.
  5. Mining associations and cooperatives.
  6. Succession-based effective possession.
  7. Other actions as determined by ARCOM’s Board.

 

  1. Processing procedures initiated before May 2023. These will continue under the previous regulation. Physical registry books must be submitted to the Executive Director within 3 days and fully digitized within 12 months.

 

  1. Purpose of the new instruction. This new instruction reflects ARCOM’s commitment to a more orderly, modern, and supervised mining sector. By digitizing the registry and assigning individual responsibility for recorded data, it protects state assets, combats informality, and strengthens legal certainty.

 

 

Resolution No. ARCOM-004/25 – REGULATION FOR THE CONTROL OF MINERAL EXPORTS

 

  1. The regulation applies to holders of mining rights operating under small, medium, and large-scale mining regimes. Both individuals and companies must comply with its provisions if they intend to export minerals from Ecuador.

 

  1. Production Certificate. Issued by authorized mining titleholders, this document must detail the volume, origin, mineral type, purity, and other technical data. Only analyses conducted by laboratories accredited by the Ecuadorian Accreditation Service (“SAE”) will be valid.

 

  1. Packing List. A detailed inventory of each shipment, including weights, destination, port of exit, and other verification data. This document must be electronically signed.

 

  1. Certificate of Export of Mining Products. Issued exclusively by ARCOM, this certificate legally authorizes the export of minerals. No exports may proceed without it.

 

  1. Fee structure. Medium- and large-scale mining companies must pay an annual fee for certificates, while small-scale miners will pay a fee per export.

 

  1. Laboratory requirements. All chemical analyses (purity, concentration, moisture, penalizing metals, etc.) must be conducted by accredited and registered laboratories. Results must be delivered within 25 days. Labs must retain witness samples for up to 6 months and report the presence of mercury or other elements in the samples.

 

  1. Conditions for export approval. ARCOM will not authorize exports if the mining titleholder:

 

  • Has failed to update their tax domicile.
  • Has a suspended or untraceable RUC (tax ID).
  • Submits unclear, false, or incomplete information.

 

This regulation strengthens state control over mining and exports, establishing clear rules to ensure minerals leave the country with proper technical, legal, and tax documentation. It also promotes transparency, protects the environment, and improves institutional coordination.

 

Resolution No. ARCOM-005/25 – INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PREPARATION OF CADASTRAL REPORTS AND CERTIFICATIONS

  1. This instruction facilitates the issuance of reports and certifications related to the National Mining Cadaster, which is a critical component of all concession and permit processes in the mining sector.

 

  1. Target audience. The instruction applies to all institutions and individuals involved in mining administration, including the Ministry of Energy and Mines, Decentralized Autonomous Governments (GADs), and mining concessionaires.

 

  1. Key regulated aspects:

 

  1. Standardized formats for cadastral reports and certifications.
  2. Validation of geometries and coordinates (PSAD56 and WGS84 systems).
  3. Unique cadastral codes for each mining right.
  4. Validity periods and deadlines (30 days for issuance, 30-day validity).
  5. Review of overlaps with environmentally, culturally, or strategically sensitive areas.

 

  1. Differentiated reporting. The instruction outlines how to prepare reports for various types of mining: artisanal and subsistence mining, small-scale mining (metallic minerals), medium-scale mining, large-scale mining, and small-scale mining (non-metallic minerals).

 

  1. Mandatory nationwide use. The instruction applies nationwide and must be used by ARCOM officials, the Ministry of Energy and Mines, GADs that manage construction materials, and individuals or companies handling mining rights under any regime (artisanal, small-, medium-, or large-scale mining).

 

Purpose of the instruction. This regulation provides Ecuador with a modern and robust tool that will help reduce conflicts, improve the quality of technical information, and streamline administrative procedures.

Carlos Torres, Senior Associate at CorralRosales
ctorres@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

© CORRALROSALES 2025
NOTA: The previous text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not responsible for any loss or damage caused as a result of having acted or stopped acting based on the information contained in this document. Any additional determined situation requires the specific opinion and concept of the firm in Quito/Guayaquil, Ecuador.

CORRALROSALES

CORPORATE AMENDMENTS INTRODUCED BY THE ORGANIC LAW OF NATIONAL SOLIDARITY

The Organic Law of National Solidarity (the Law) was published in the Official Registry Supplement No. 56 on June 10, 2025. Its purpose is to establish a special legal framework in the context of the internal armed conflict, ensuring the continuity and stability of the country’s economic and productive activities.

Within the corporate sphere, the Law introduces the following reforms:

 

a) Restrictions on Simplified Stock Corporations (SAS):

Simplified Stock Corporations (SAS) are prohibited from engaging in activities related to financial operations, securities markets, insurance, operations linked to strategic sectors, mining, or activities associated with these sectors, as well as other activities subject to special regulation under applicable law.

Pursuant to Article 313 of the Constitution, strategic sectors include energy in all its forms, telecommunications, non-renewable natural resources, transportation and refining of hydrocarbons, biodiversity and genetic heritage, the radio spectrum, and water resources.

However, the Law does not determine whether this restriction applies to existing SAS or whether such entities must change to a different corporate type. This matter, along with the scope of what constitutes linked operations, may be clarified through the regulation issued under the Law.

 

b) Creation of the sports corporation (sociedad anónima deportiva):

The Law creates the sports corporation (sociedad anónima deportiva), a high-performance, profit oriented legal entity of a commercial nature, whose capital is divided into negotiable shares contributed by shareholders who are liable only up to the amount of their individual shares. It may be formed through a contract, a unilateral act, or other forms provided by law, and it shall engage exclusively in sports activities within a single discipline. The profit-oriented nature of professional sports corporations shall not disqualify them from being considered a sport organization.

Sports clubs or teams participating in professional sports may transform into sports corporations.

 

 

Milton Carrera, Partner at CorralRosales
mcarrera@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

 

© CORRALROSALES 2025
NOTA: The previous text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not responsible for any loss or damage caused as a result of having acted or stopped acting based on the information contained in this document. Any additional determined situation requires the specific opinion and concept of the firm in Quito/Guayaquil, Ecuador.

CORRALROSALES

AMENDMENTS TO THE REGULATIONS OF THE ELECTRICITY LAW

By means of Executive Decree No. 32 of June 15, 2025 (the “Decree”), published on June 18, 2025, in the Official Register No. 62, the General Regulations to the Law on Public Electricity Service (“RGLOSPEE”) were amended. The Decree entered into force on June 18, 2025.

 

Below is a summary of the main amendments:

 

  1. High-voltage Disconnection. The National Electricity Operator is authorized to disconnect high-voltage consumers from the National Interconnected System (“SNI”) during periods of power generation deficit or rationing.

 

  1. Mandatory Generation. High-voltage consumers will be required to implement power generation systems to cover their demand by December 18, 2026. Any surplus energy may be injected into the SNI, subject to the regulations issued by the Electricity Regulation and Control Agency (“ARCONEL”).

 

  1. Direct Delegation. The Ministry of Energy and Mines (“MEM”) may directly delegate to the private sector the execution of electricity generation projects using non-conventional renewable sources (e.g., solar, wind, geothermal, small-scale hydro) or transitional sources (e.g., natural gas, nuclear, green hydrogen), provided such projects are not included in the Electricity Master Plan (“PME”) and their nominal capacity does not exceed 100 MW.

 

  1. Simplified Procedure. Private electricity generation projects using non-conventional renewable sources (with capacities between 10 and 100 MW) or transitional sources (up to 100 MW), not included in the PME and incorporating energy storage and interconnection networks, may be directly delegated through a simplified procedure.

 

  1. Public Selection Processes. The private sector may submit proposals to the MEM for electricity generation projects exceeding 100 MW or transmission projects that are not contemplated in the PME. These may be awarded through a public selection process (“PPS”), in which the proponent may participate and improve its bid under the terms of the respective PPS.

 

  1. Self-generation. Private self-generation projects will not require prior approval from the Ministry of Economy and Finance (“MEF”).

 

  1. Payment Guarantees. The State and/or public electricity distributors (the “Distributors”) may guarantee the payments to the private sector arising from concession contracts and/or regulated contracts through trusts, liquidity guarantees, contingency funds, or other similar mechanisms. In any case, approval by the MEF will be required.

 

  1. Payment Priority. Payments derived from commercial transactions related to regulated demand must adhere to the order of priority established by ARCONEL, with private generators and transmitters occupying the first position. Distributors must establish trusts to comply with this order by December 15, 2025.

 

  1. Assignment to financiers. Concession contracts may be assigned to financiers: (i) due to serious breach of payments and obligations by the concessionaire under the financing contracts; or (ii) due to breaches by the concessionaire of the concession contract. Financiers may assume the position of the concessionaire directly or through a third party approved by the MEM.

 

  1. No reversion. The assets of generators installed for self-supply, self-generators, cogenerators, and non-conventional renewable energy generators with a capacity of up to 10 MW will not be required to revert to the State.

 

Carlos Torres, Senior Associate at CorralRosales
ctorres@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

 

Mario Fernández, Associate at CorralRosales
mfernandez@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

 

© CORRALROSALES 2025
NOTA: The previous text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not responsible for any loss or damage caused as a result of having acted or stopped acting based on the information contained in this document. Any additional determined situation requires the specific opinion and concept of the firm in Quito/Guayaquil, Ecuador.

CORRALROSALES

MANDATORY APPLICATION OF STANDARD-TYPE TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AUDITS

On June 13, 2025, the Ministry of Environment, Water and Ecological Transition (“MAATE”), through the Undersecretariat of Environmental Quality, issued Circular No. MAATE-SCA-2025-0010-C (“Circular”), addressed to companies in the hydrocarbons, mining, electricity, telecommunications and other activities subject to environmental control. The Circular states that:

  • All Environmental Compliance Audits (“AAC”) shall be prepared solely based on the Terms of Reference (“TORs”) Type-Standard, contained in Annex 9 of Ministerial Agreement MAATE-MAATE-2024-074-A, issued on November 20, 2024 (“Agreement”).
  • Customized TDRs will not be required to be submitted to or pre-approved by MAATE.
  • Audits must be submitted within 90 days after the end of the audited period.
  • Failure to submit the audits within the established deadline will be administratively sanctioned.
  • The audit report shall expressly state that it was prepared in accordance with the Agreement and Annex 9.

The Circular applies generally and directly to all operators subject to environmental audits, within the framework of the procedures initiated before and after the entry into force of the Organic Environmental Code and its secondary regulations. The legal basis for this measure is found in the Agreement that approves the “Instrument for the immediate approval of Environmental Audits of Compliance and Conjunction, Terms of Reference and Environmental Compliance Reports”.

This Agreement is framed within the principles established in the Organic Law for the Optimization and Efficiency of Administrative Procedures, such as simplicity, celerity and subsequent control, which determines in the Third Transitory Provision that if the operator does not submit the withdrawal of its TDR process within 30 days from the entry into force of the Agreement, it will be obliged to use the Standard-Type TDRs.

Determined by the Agreement and the Circular:

  • Review if you have previous active TDR proceedings and evaluate submitting a waiver if applicable.
  • Plan the preparation of your Environmental Compliance Audit, ensuring its delivery within 90 days.
  • Adapt your technical and legal procedures to the mandatory use of the standard format (Annex 9).
  • Include the required regulatory reference in the background of the report to avoid observations.
  • Train your environmental and legal staff on the new requirements to ensure effective implementation.

The Circular is a mandatory instruction of immediate application for all operators subject to environmental control. Compliance with it not only guarantees the validity of audits but also avoids delays and penalties. This measure represents a step towards the standardization and efficiency of environmental procedures in the country.

 

 

Carlos Torres, Senior Associate at CorralRosales
ctorres@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

 

© CORRALROSALES 2025
DISCLAIMER: The previous text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not responsible for any loss or damage caused as a result of having acted or stopped acting based on the information contained in this document. Any additional determined situation requires the specific opinion and concept of the firm in Quito/Guayaquil, Ecuador.

CORRALROSALES

From Law to Practice: The Non-Registrability of Trademarks on Grounds of Unfair Competition in Ecuador

Within the framework of the common industrial property regime of the Andean Community, of which Ecuador is a member state, Decision 486 establishes in Article 137 an important rule for national IP offices:

“When the competent national office has reasonable grounds to infer that a registration has been applied for in order to perpetrate, facilitate, or consolidate an act of unfair competition, it may refuse such registration.”

Among the scenarios that may constitute unfair competition is the following:

“Any act capable of creating confusion, by any means, with respect to the establishment, products, or industrial or commercial activity of a competitor.”

Although this provision has been in force since the year 2000, its application by the Ecuadorian IP Office (SENADI) has historically been limited. The authority has traditionally prioritized other grounds for refusal, such as lack of distinctiveness—whether inherent or acquired—or bad faith, especially where there was a prior relationship between the applicant and the rightful trademark owner.

For years, the grounds of unfair competition were dismissed and considered by some as a matter exclusively governed by antitrust or competition law, outside the scope of trademark registration. However, in recent years, there has been a gradual shift in the IP Office´s administrative interpretation of this provision.

Jurisprudential Evolution: The “CARMEX” Case

A significant illustration of this change is found in a recent decision rejecting the registration of the mark CARMEX for goods in Class 03, including bleaching preparations, soaps, cosmetics, and essential oils, among others.

The application, filed by an Ecuadorian citizen in 2020, was opposed by the owner of the CARMEX trademark in multiple foreign jurisdictions, including the US, UK, Brazil, Mexico, and China. The opposing party alleged that the application constituted an act of unfair competition and a breach of the principle of good faith.

In a decision issued in May 2025, the Ecuadorian IP Office ruled as follows:

  • The argument concerning foreign registrations was dismissed on the basis of the principle of territoriality, enshrined in trademark law.
  • The opposition was upheld, recognizing that the use of the applied-for mark constituted an act of unfair competition through imitation, considering the prior use of the CARMEX mark in other markets. This could potentially mislead consumers and unduly benefit from the opponent’s reputation.

The IP Office concluded that granting the registration would run contrary to the principles governing fair market competition. It emphasized that the intellectual property system must protect not only the trademark owner´s interests, but also those of consumers and market balance.

Legal Implications

This decision marks a significant shift in Ecuadorian administrative practice, as it effectively incorporates the analysis of unfair competition as an autonomous ground for refusal. It aligns with the principles of integrity in the industrial property system and commercial loyalty.

The resolution also reflects a more flexible interpretative approach, more consistent with the globalized nature of commerce, acknowledging that the principle of territoriality, though still valid, should not be rigidly applied when it results in the improper appropriation of well-known or widely used marks.

Final Reflection

The recognition of unfair competition as a legitimate ground for refusal of trademark registration is a meaningful step toward a more comprehensive application of trademark law. In a landscape where commercial practices evolve constantly, IP Offices must adopt dynamic criteria that provide effective protection against practices that distort the market and undermine legitimate rights.

Ecuador’s experience in this case sets a valuable precedent not only at the national level, but also as a regional reference for Andean countries and other jurisdictions facing similar challenges at the intersection of trademark law and competition law.

Such decisions -and any that help guarantee and uphold the rights of trademark owners- are a welcome development.

 

María Cecilia Romoleroux
Socia en CorralRosales
maria@corralrosales.com

 

Katherine González
Asociada senior en CorralRosales
katherine@corralrosales.com

TAX EFFECTS OF DONATIONS OF EQUIPMENT TO THE NATIONAL POLICE AND ARMED FORCES

 

Through Official Register No. 56, Sixth Supplement, dated June 11, 2025, the Law of National Solidarity was published. This law introduces financial, tax, and security reforms aimed at ensuring national economic stability and promoting economic recovery.

Regarding the tax regime, the law establishes a benefit consisting of a reduction of the generated income tax, equivalent to the value of new equipment and supply donations made in favor of the National Police and/or the Armed Forces. This reduction may not exceed 30% of the tax and is not subject to reimbursement.

I.e., the law allows taxpayers to pay up to 30% of the income tax due through donations to the National Police and/or Armed Forces. For reconciliation purposes, this reduction would result in a lower calculation base for the profit-sharing payments to employees, as illustrated in the following example:

This new benefit will apply starting from fiscal year 2026.

 

 

Andrea Moya, Socia en CorralRosales
amoya@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

© CORRALROSALES 2024
NOTA: EL texto anterior ha sido elaborado con fines informativos. CorralRosales no es responsable de ninguna pérdida o daño ocasionado como consecuencia de haberse actuado o dejado de actuar en base a la información contenida en este documento. Cualquier situación determinada adicional requiere la opinión y concepto específico de la firma.

CORRALROSALES

Application by distributor rejected on grounds of bad faith and unfair competition

  • An application for GOLOKO was opposed based on the marks FOUR LOKO and the contractual relationship between the parties in Peru
  • While the Ecuadorian IP Office rejected the opposition, an action for industrial property rights infringement was upheld in Peru
  • The Ecuadorian IP Office overturned the first-instance decision, finding bad faith and unfair competition on the applicant’s part

Trademark registration is a key mechanism for protecting IP rights. However, this procedure is not always straightforward or legitimate, and there are cases where trademark applications may be rejected due to bad faith or unfair competition.

For example, trademark applications have been submitted by distributors which, in the absence of a trademark registration in Ecuador, have attempted to register the relevant trademark despite a distribution agreement confirming that ownership belonged to its legitimate owner, the grantor.

In a recent case, the Ecuadorian IP Office issued an interesting resolution denying the registration of a trademark on the ground that the application constituted an act of bad faith and unfair competition.

Background

Food For Life EIRL applied to register the trademark GOLOKO for goods in Class 33. This application was opposed by Phusion Projects LLC based on the marks FOUR LOKO, registered in Class 32, and the contractual relationship between the parties in Peru.

Phusion Projects and Food For Life maintained a contractual relationship, as the applicant had been an authorised distributor of FOUR LOKO-branded goods in Peru for several years. Therefore, at the time of the trademark application for GOLOKO, the applicant had full knowledge of the existence, ownership and recognition of the FOUR LOKO marks.

The IP Office rejected the opposition, considering that there were sufficient differences between the marks to avoid confusion among consumers. However, the contractual relationship between the parties was not analysed.

In parallel, a complaint for industrial property rights infringement was filed in Peru against Food For Life and its related company, Servicios Exal SAC, for manufacturing, marketing, distributing and promoting beverages under the GO LOKO marks. Injunction measures were requested against use of these marks, claiming that, in addition to the visual and aural similarities between the marks, the packaging of the contested goods was highly similar to that bearing the registered trademark.

The action was upheld in Peru, serving as primary evidence that the application filed in Ecuador constituted an act of unfair competition and bad faith.

Decision

The Ecuadorian IP Office, through Resolution OCDI-2025-167, overturned the first-instance decision, accepted the opposition filed by Phusion Projects and denied the registration of the GOLOKO trademark.
The main arguments for finding bad faith and unfair competition on the part of the applicant were as follows:

  • Food For Life intended to compete in the Ecuadorian market with a mark that could be confused with an already registered trademark; and
  • Food For Life, as a distributor of Phusion Projects in Peru, was aware of FOUR LOKO’s market penetration and recognition.
  • Food For Life intended to use this knowledge to its advantage by registering a confusingly similar mark.

Comment

With this resolution, the Ecuadorian IP Office set a groundbreaking precedent for the protection of trademarks which, due to their notoriety and market positioning resulting from their owners’ advertising efforts, are attractive to competitors seeking to obtain unfair benefits.

The rejection of trademark registrations on the ground of bad faith and unfair competition is an essential mechanism to ensure fairness in the market and protect IP rights. In cases where there is a distribution agreement between the applicant and the opponent, the evaluation of the application becomes even more crucial, as prior agreements between the parties play a significant role in determining the legitimacy of the registration. Companies and distributors must act transparently under commercial contracts
and intellectual property laws to avoid conflicts and ensure proper market competition.

 

Andrea Miño
Associated in CorralRosales
andrea@corralrosales.com 

MINISTERIAL AGREEMENT MDT-2025-053 REFORMS TO EMPLOYER’S OBLIGATIONS CONTROL AND INSPECTION PROCEDURES

 

On May 15, 2025, the “Ministerial Agreement MDT-2025-053 (hereinafter the “Agreement”)” was published in the fourth supplement of the Official Registry No. 39, it amends Ministerial Agreement MDT-2023-140 “General Rules Applicable to the Control of Employer’s Obligations and Inspection Procedures”. We highlight the following:

a) The Ministry of Labor; through the Single Labor System (hereinafter “SUT”); will generate a HASH code that will act as a digital fingerprint for any document that’s been registered, reported and/or approved in the SUT, in order to validate its authenticity.

 

b) Employers have 1 month from the beginning of the employment relationship, to register the employees’ required data.

 

c) Employers are required to keep in physical and/or digital format any document that’s has to be registered, approved and reported to the Ministry of Labor, in order to present them to the authorities when required.

 

d) Employers will have 15 days to complete the legalization process of termination minutes, which includes: (i) generating the termination minutes in the SUT, (ii) signing the document, (iii) making the payment, (iv) registering both the certificate and the payment in the system.

 

e) In the event that the former employees cannot be contacted or refuse to receive the settlement document, the employers will have 15 additional days to make the payment in the SUT.

 

f) Once the Internal Labor Regulations (RIT) are approved, employers will have 15 days to download the text and the resolution of approval, since after this period they will be deleted from the system.

 

g) Employers must deliver to their employees or former employees; either in original or as a certified copy; the documents derived from the contractual relationship (contracts, modification agreements, termination minutes, payment slips, among others).

 

h) Until May 2026, employers will be able to download in PDF the documents derived from the obligations registered, approved or reported in the SUT. This information will be automatically deleted once the established deadlines have been met.

 

Employers will be solely responsible for maintaining the information.

The Agreement stipulates that the corresponding ministry offices must take the necessary steps to update the SUT, as well as socialize the public on the use of the HASH code.

 

 

 

Edmundo Ramos, Socio en CorralRosales
eramos@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

 

María Victoria Beltrán, Asociada Senior en CorralRosales
mbeltran@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

 

© CORRALROSALES 2024
NOTA: EL texto anterior ha sido elaborado con fines informativos. CorralRosales no es responsable de ninguna pérdida o daño ocasionado como consecuencia de haberse actuado o dejado de actuar en base a la información contenida en este documento. Cualquier situación determinada adicional requiere la opinión y concepto específico de la firma.

CORRALROSALES

THE LIST OF SPECIAL TAXPAYERS AND WITHHOLDING AGENTS HAS BEEN UPDATED

 

Through Resolutions NAC-DGERCGC25-00000010 and NAC-DGERCGC25-00000011, the Internal Revenue Service (SRI) updated the lists of taxpayers designated as withholding agents and special taxpayers, respectively.

Taxpayers who have been included under either of these classifications must comply with the corresponding formal duties and tax obligations in accordance with the assigned status, starting June 1, 2025, and for as long as they retain such status.

Both taxpayers included and those excluded from the aforementioned categories are required to update their invoicing systems to reflect their new status by June 13, 2025.

 

 

Andrea Moya, Socia en CorralRosales
amoya@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

© CORRALROSALES 2024
NOTA: EL texto anterior ha sido elaborado con fines informativos. CorralRosales no es responsable de ninguna pérdida o daño ocasionado como consecuencia de haberse actuado o dejado de actuar en base a la información contenida en este documento. Cualquier situación determinada adicional requiere la opinión y concepto específico de la firma.

CORRALROSALES