Regulations for applying the 0% outflow tax rate on transfers of money abroad made by foreign airlines

Regulations for applying the 0% outflow tax rate transfers of money abroad made by foreign airlines - CorralRosales - Lawyers Ecuador

Regulation NAC-DGERCGC21-00000040 issued by the General Director of the Internal Revenue Service and published in the Second Supplement of the Official Registry 550 of October 1, 2021, establishes the requirements to apply the 0% rate of Outflow Tax (ISD) on transfers of money abroad made by foreign airlines.

  1. Beneficiaries:


In order to apply the 0% rate, airlines must be designated by the authority of their country to develop in Ecuador activities of international transportation of passengers, cargo, a combination of them or cargo only.

  1. Application:


Prior to the transfer of money, the beneficiaries must submit to the financial institution or courier company the following:

  • The “Informative Declaration Form of Transactions Exempted or Not Subject to Outflow Tax “, using for this purpose box 819.

 

  • The documents that certify its quality of beneficiary, this is the designation by the authority of its country to develop in Ecuador activities of international transport.

Withholding certificates should not be issued for transfers of money abroad that are subject to 0% Outflow Tax rate.

  1. Reimbursement

If beneficiaries have made transfers of money abroad from October 1, 2021, and have been subject to 5% Outflow Tax, this tax must be reimbursed by the financial institutions or courier companies that made the withholding.

Andrea Moya - CorralRosales - Lawyer Ecuador

Specialist in Tax matter

Andrea Moya, associate at CorralRosales
amoya@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

Do you want to receive our newsletters with information like the one you just read?
Click here and subscribe.

DISCLAIMER: The previous text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not responsible for any loss or damage caused as a result of having acted or stopped acting based on the information contained in this document. Any additional determined situation requires the specific opinion and concept of the firm.

CORRALROSALES

Suspension of workday on November 3rd

Suspensión de la jornada de trabajo el 03 de noviembre - CorralRosales - Abogados Ecuador

On October 15th, 2021, the President of the Republic issued the Executive Decree 222, by which the following was established:

1.    To suspend of working day corresponding to November 03, 2021.

2.    The recovery of the working day for the private sector will be made by mutual agreement between employers and workers.

3.    During November 01, 02 and 03, 2021, the entities and agencies of the public sector shall guarantee the provision of public services.

Edmundo Ramos

Specialist in Labor Law
Edmundo Ramos, socio de CorralRosales
eramos@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

Marta Villagómez

Specialist in Labor Law

Marta Villagómez, asociada de CorralRosales
mvillagomez@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

Presidential Decree No. 165

Presidential Decree No. 165 - CorralRosales - Lawyers Ecuador

On August 18, 2021, President Guillermo Lasso issued a Regulation to the Arbitration and Mediation Law, through Presidential Decree No. 165 (henceforth “the Regulation”. It is worth mentioning that, until its promulgation, Ecuador did not have a similar regulation, and therefore, innumerable contradictory interpretations were generated that distorted the nature of our arbitration process. The Regulation mainly deals with arbitration and public contracts, preliminary measures, annulment actions, among others. The most relevant aspects are detailed below:

1.- Responsibility of Arbitrators

Under this new regulation, arbitrators are subject to liability for damages caused by intent or gross negligence. In addition, the parties involved may agree to arbitrate any action related to the responsibility of the arbitrators.

The arbitration institutions, their directors and employees are subject to an equal responsibility.

2.- Arbitrations and Public Contracts

The Regulation allows arbitration in public contracts with the State and public entities through the following ways:

– By celebrating an arbitration agreement prior to the emergence of the dispute.
– By celebrating an arbitration agreement post-dispute.
– By application of a law or international treaty that allows it.

The arbitrators may decide on the facts, acts or administrative actions referenced in the case, including acts of termination, expiration or penalties.

Furthermore, the Regulation allows a contractor to request an arbitration agreement for a contracting entity. Said agreement will be considered accepted if not replied within 30 days from its reception.

3.- Approval of the State Attorney General (SAG)

The Regulation establishes the need for prior approval by the SAG only for cases where international arbitration is agreed and when the dispute has arisen previously. In addition, the mediation acts which contain an agreement that exceeds twenty thousand dollars, must be approved by the SAG.

4.- Preliminary Measures

The Regulation allows the Court and emergency arbitrators to issue preliminary measures to:

– Maintain the status quo until the dispute is resolved.
– Prevent the continuation of any current damage or the materialization of imminent damage.
– Preserve assets pertaining to the process.
– Preserve evidence.
– Guarantee compliance with obligations related to the arbitration process.
– Preserve the jurisdiction of the court.

Further, it is possible to request measures to ordinary judges prior to the constitution of an arbitration tribunal, without implying the waiver of the agreement. The Court may modify, suspend, or revoke any preliminary measures, either at the request of the parties or ex officio, after notifying the parties

5. Nullity Proceedings

The nullity proceeding of an arbitration award must be resolved within 30 days from its presentation to the Provincial Court of Justice. The abuse of the right in the exercise of the nullity action will be sanctioned in accordance with Ecuadorian law.

To resolve the nullity action, the principles of minimal judicial intervention, specificity, estoppel, validation, and alternation will be observed.

6. Responsibility of the Public Official

Civil or administrative liability shall be incurred by the official who, having refused to sign a mediation agreement, would have caused a resolution against to the public entity, when it was reasonably foreseeable that, through mediation, a beneficial agreement could have been reached for said entity.

7. Mediation for Administrative Disputes

The State or public entities may resolve any administrative dispute by mediation, which may address issues such as: nullifying or modifying acts of termination, expiration, penalties, or fines, regardless of the body that issues them.

8. Scope of the Arbitration Agreement

The Regulation establishes that the arbitration agreement also applies to those whose consent to submit to arbitration is derived, according to the precepts of good faith, from their active and decisive participation in the negotiation, celebration, execution, or termination of the legal business that comprises the agreement. And, to those who intend to derive rights or benefits from the legal business (successors, assignees), and to the administrative bodies who started the actions.

9. Promotion of Arbitration

The Regulation indicates that arbitration will be preferred and promoted in disputes arising out of contracting processes that bind public administrations.

10. Party Autonomy

The parties may freely agree and determine the procedural rules to which the arbitration process will be subject. In the absence of this agreement, the Arbitral Tribunal will adopt the rules that it deems most appropriate for each specific case.

11. Confidentiality

The arbitration centers may include information related to the arbitration in their publications, provided that such information does not identify the parties. Similarly, arbitrators’ resolutions may be published solely for academic purposes.

During nullity proceedings, the parties may request the President of the Provincial Court to adopt measures to guarantee the confidentiality of the process (for example the non-identification of the parties).

12.- Mediation and Deadlines

The presentation of the request for mediation will interrupt the statute of limitations and expiration; These terms will begin to run once the mediation is over.

Edgar Bustamante

Specialist in Arbitration

Edgar Bustamante, associate at CorralRosales
ebustamante@corralrosales.com
+593 4 263 0441

Do you want to receive our newsletters with information like the one you just read?
Click here and subscribe.

DISCLAIMER: The previous text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not responsible for any loss or damage caused as a result of having acted or stopped acting based on the information contained in this document. Any additional determined situation requires the specific opinion and concept of the firm.

CORRALROSALES

The benefits of the ICSID Convention vis-à-vis foreign investors

The benefits of the ICSID Convention vis-à-vis foreign investors - CorralRosales - Sofía Rosales - Lawyers Ecuador

During this past month, Ecuador’s ratification of the ICSID Convention and its direct influence on the attraction of foreign investment has been the subject of many comments.

Why is it key to attracting foreign investment? Dispute resolution under the ICSID Convention has many advantages, and particularly regarding arbitration, there are 3 main characteristics that make it so attractive to investors: (i) it is an institution specialized in international investments; (ii) it provides for the automatic recognition of awards; and (iii) it has its own procedure for annulment of awards. Below an analysis of these characteristics:

  1. Specialized institution in international investments:

Having an arbitration administered by ICSID gives the investor the security of having a global and independent institution specifically dedicated to the settlement of international investment disputes. It is often difficult for a foreign investor to invest in a country if, in the event a dispute arises, it would be resolved by the country’s own courts. This generates a disadvantage for the investor and a feeling of lack of protection, especially considering that local courts often do not have the necessary experience in this field.

In an arbitration administered by ICSID, an impartial arbitral tribunal, which is expert in the subject matter, and has an in-depth knowledge of international investment disputes- which are often the cause of disputes- is constituted.

  • Automatic recognition of awards:

The Contracting States – currently numbering 156 (including Ecuador) – are compelled to automatically recognize the award rendered under the ICSID Convention, as if it were a decision issued by the courts of that country, i.e., without the need to carry out the formal recognition procedure known as exequatur. This facilitates, simplifies, and significantly shortens the time in which the award is enforced, which means less time and costs for both the investor and the State.

  • Procedure for annulment of awards:

As a general rule in international arbitration, an action for annulment of an award is brought before the ordinary courts of the country of the seat of arbitration. On the contrary, in the case of an arbitration administered by ICSID, such action is brought before the Center itself, in such a way that that no local courts of any State are involved, but an ad hoc commission composed of 3 individuals selected from the list of arbitrators of the Center (other than the members of the tribunal that rendered the award, and of different nationalities from any of the members of such tribunal and the parties) is appointed.

In conclusion, the protection derived from the arbitration procedure under the ICSID Convention enhances the foreign investor’s environment, which, undoubtedly, added to other measures adopted by the government, could turn Ecuador into a sort of investment hub in Latin America.

Sofía Rosales
Asocciate at CorralRosales
srosales@corralrosales.com

Non-Intrusive inspection for customs matters

Non-intrusive inspection for customs matters - CorralRosales - Tax Bulletin - Abogados Ecuador

The President issued the Executive Decree 227 on October 19, 2021, by which the customs regulations were amended to allow non-intrusive inspections. Below a summary of the mos important matters:

1.    Definitions:

The following 3 definitions were added:

•    Non-intrusive equipment: Equipment, machines or devices that have a source of X-ray emission, which allow through tunnels and arches to obtain images from different angles, which have an interface or computer system with a series of tools that allow the discrimination of densities by color, size increase, mobilization, management of brightness, contrast, measurement, among other tools.

•    Physical inspection: Action carried out by the competent authorities, which may be performed simultaneously, in order to verify the nature, origin, condition, quantity, value, tariff classification and regulatory treatment of the goods.

•    Non-intrusive inspection: Action carried out by the competent authorities, which may be performed simultaneously, in order to verify the nature of the goods, through the use of non-intrusive equipment that allows scanning the merchandise inside a container, cargo unit, packaging, package or any other object, without having to unload it, in order to compare with the information in the customs declaration and verify compliance with the applicable regulations.

2.    Non-intrusive physical inspection

The non-intrusive physical inspection was included. Through this type of inspection, the nature and other characteristics of the goods will be verified by means of the exclusive use of non-intrusive equipment and applying risk profiles established by the Customs Authority.

3.    Control with non-intrusive equipment

In the case of imports, the Customs Authority will establish which customs warehouses must have the necessary equipment for non-intrusive inspections to be made to goods, cargo units and means of transport that have been risk profiled.

In the case of exports, all goods, cargo units and means of transport will be subject to controls with non-intrusive equipment by the Customs Authority.

The Customs Authority will have a term of 60 days to establish the minimum requirements to be met by the non-intrusive equipment. Once these requirements are established, the Customs Authority must establish which warehouses, ports, airports, and border crossings require the implementation of such equipment, which must operate within 12 months from the publication of the decree in the Official Gazette.

4.    Concurrent control

The Customs Authority may request documents different from the supporting and accompanying customs documents in order to establish the accuracy and veracity of the data included in the customs declarations.

Andrea Moya - CorralRosales - Lawyer Ecuador

Specialist in Tax matter

Andrea Moya, associate at CorralRosales
amoya@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

Do you want to receive our newsletters with information like the one you just read?
Click here and subscribe.

DISCLAIMER: The previous text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not responsible for any loss or damage caused as a result of having acted or stopped acting based on the information contained in this document. Any additional determined situation requires the specific opinion and concept of the firm.

CORRALROSALES

Latin Lawyer – IBM´s US$60 billion global spinoff calls on Latin American firms

Latin Lawyer - IBM´s US$60 billion global spinoff calls on Latin American firms - CorralRosales - Lawyers Ecuador

DETAILS

DATE: 18-10-2021

CORRALROSALES IN THE NEWS:

Andrea Moya

Edmundo Ramos

Xavier Rosales

Darío Escobar

Edgar Bustamante

Marta Villagómez

Milton Carrera

Ramón Paz y Miño

Sofía Rosales

MEDIA: Latin Lawyer

Multinational technology company IBM has hired CorralRosales, along with other Latin American firms, to carve-out Kyndryl. It does so by establishing the managed infrastructure services unit as an independent business.

This carve-out, in which our team of experts has been working on and which has a global value of US$60 billion, was signed on September 1. The aim is for Kyndryl to become an independent company headquartered in New York by the end of 2022. 

On behalf of CorralRosales, the advisors in the transaction are partners Xavier Rosales, Edmundo Ramos, Andrea Moya; and associates Milton Carrera, Marta Villagómez, Sofía Rosales and Darío Escobar in Quito; and associates Ramón Paz y Miño and Edgar Bustamante in Guayaquil.

According to Latin Lawyer, “IBM’s Shareholders will receive at least 80.1% of Kyndryl’s common stock once the spinoff is complete, with IBM retaining the remaining stake. (…) While IBM and Kyndryl will be independent entities, at launch they will both be each other’s biggest clients and remain as strategic partners”.

If you want to read more (under registration), click here

The extraordinary appeal for review provided for in the Organic Administrative Code, against the decisions issued by the National Service of Intellectual Rights

The extraordinary appeal for review provided for in the Organic Administrative Code, against the decisions issued by the National Service of Intellectual Rights - CorralRosales - Lawyers Ecuador

The Organic Administrative Code (“COA”) provides that, against the decisions issued by the public administration, there are two kinds of appeals: ordinary appeal and extraordinary appeal for review. The first seeks to have the authority re-analyze the merits of the case with a view on modifying its decision. The extraordinary appeal for review, on the other hand, is possible only when any of the specific grounds provided for in the COA are met – it does not constitute a third instance – hence its extraordinary nature. In recent years, a common practice has been to file an extraordinary appeal for review against final decisions denying or granting the registration of a trademark, against which the ordinary appeal has already been lodged -or it was not filed in due course- in order for the National Service for Intellectual Rights (“SENADI”) to change its criteria regarding the risk of confusion or association between the conflicting marks. Although the SENADI prima facie gives way to this type of procedure, it has stated that “The extraordinary appeal for review constitutes a legal remedy aimed at correcting an error in the formation of the administrative will, or any illegality in the issuance of the decision, with the interested party having the ordinary remedies to disagree with the criteria of the judge, in this case, with the comparative analysis of the confronted marks.[1]

In this regard, Article 232 of the COA provides that “The interested individual may file an extraordinary appeal for review of the final administrative act when any of the following circumstances are verified:

1. That when issuing them, an obvious and manifest factual error has been incurred in, which affects the merits of the case, provided that the factual error results from the documents incorporated into the file.

2. That when issuing them, an obvious and manifest error of law has been incurred in, which affects the merits of the case. (…) The extraordinary appeal for review shall be filed, in the case of cause 1, within a period of one year following the date of notification of the contested decision (…)”.

It derives from the aforementioned provision that, unlike the ordinary appeal, the extraordinary appeal for review is not intended to review the legal arguments relied on by the authority in its decision but is aimed at reviewing and remedying, if necessary, defects in the processing of the administrative proceeding.

Unfortunately, nowadays, many users have chosen to file extraordinary appeals for review when what they are really requesting is to review the existence or not of the risk of confusion between two trademarks. And this is usually done as a way of demonstrating dissatisfaction with the decision issued through second instance decisions. An example of this can be found in case No. SENADI-2016-92900, in which SENADI admitted to process an extraordinary appeal for review against a decision denying an appeal in which the opposition filed was accepted, and the registration of a trademark was rejected. Within the aforementioned extraordinary appeal for review, the arguments used to request the revocation of the decision were:

  • Comparison between the confronted trademarks and the supposed absence of risk of confusion.
  • Absence of spelling and phonetic similarities between the conflicting marks.
  • Lack of competitive connection between the protected goods.

It is evident that the grounds for the aforementioned extraordinary appeal for review are not related to those provided for in Article 232 of the COA and what the applicant is seeking is to review again a decision that has already exhausted all administrative instances.

We will have to wait for the final decision of SENADI to have a clearer vision of its criteria in this matter. However, it is to be expected that the authority will reiterate the aforementioned criterion, rejecting the extraordinary appeal for review at the time of issuing the final decision (although it should have done it at the admissibility stage), thus putting an end to this practice. If so, with this precedent, SENADI should not admit to process these kinds of appeals in the future, since it is extremely important that the extraordinary nature of the appeal for review is respected in order to safeguard legal certainty and avoid its use as a kind of third instance by the interested parties.

[1] Decision OCDI-2021-230 from March 30, 2021. Proceeding 15-1516-RV-2S-RR-2018.

Katherine González H.
Asocciate at CorralRosales
katherine@corralrosales.com