The acquisition of medicines through small amount

The acquisition of medicines through small amount - CorralRosales - Lawyers Ecuador

The small amount is a public procurement procedure regulated in the Organic Law of the National Public Procurement System (hereinafter, the “LOSNCP”), the Regulation to the LOSCNP (hereinafter, the “Regulation”), and the Codification and Updating of Resolutions issued by the National Public Procurement Service (hereinafter, the “Codification”).

Public entities[1] can make direct contracts with suppliers through the small amount as long as they meet the following requirements:

  • The object of the contract must be: (i) the acquisition of standardized goods or services[2], which do not appear in the electronic catalog[3]; (ii) the acquisition of non-standard goods or services; or (iii) the contracting of works, solely and exclusively for the repair, remodeling, adaptation, maintenance or improvement of an existing construction or infrastructure. In no case can consulting services be hired[4].
  • In the year, the amount of the contract must not exceed the value that results from multiplying the coefficient 0.0000002 by the Initial State Budget for the corresponding fiscal year. In 2021, this value is $ 6,416.07.

Article 332 of the Codification provides that, during the year, the contracting entities may consolidate their needs and carry out a single contract for a small amount or carry out several such amounts for the same good or service, but the amount of the consolidated contract or the total amount of individual contracts may not exceed the maximum value indicated. 

These contracts may or may not be part of the annual planning that public entities are obliged to carry out[5]. But, in any case, the “small amount” tool must be used within the COMPRAS PÚBLICAS Portal[6] (www.compraspublicas.gob.ec) to publish: the needs of goods, works or services, the information of the public servant responsible for the hiring, the email in which they will receive the offers of the interested suppliers, and the maximum delivery time of said offers.

To participate in a contract for a small amount, suppliers do not need to be registered in the RUP[7]. Suppliers will be selected under the following criteria[8]:

  1. In standardized goods and services, the supplier that offers the lowest price must be chosen.
  1. In non-standard works or goods and services, the supplier that offers the best technical, financial, and legal conditions must be chosen, without the lowest price being the only selection parameter.

Once the contracting has been carried out, the contracting entities must publish its relevant information on the COMPRASPUBLICAS Portal. This information and that which, at any time, is required by[9] the National Public Procurement Service (hereinafter, “SERCOP”), will serve for this body to identify if there are non-compliance with the requirements applicable to this figure or if it was used to circumvent[10] other hiring procedures. If there are non-compliances, SERCOP will inform the competent control bodies so that they can initiate the corresponding actions.  

There are special or exceptional cases[11]in relation to this type of contracting for a small amount, such as the acquisition of medicines.

The LOSCNP does not expressly foresee the acquisition of medicines for a small amount, however this is possible under numeral 2 of article 54.2. of the Law[12], since medicines can be classified as standard goods. 

The Regulation develops this figure as follows:

“Art. 85.4.- Application of small amounts.- In duly justified and exceptional cases, contracts for the acquisition of medicines and strategic goods, the amount of which is equal to or less than multiplying the coefficient 0.0000002 of the Initial State Budget, will be carried out for a very small amount , in accordance with the provisions issued by the SERCOP for this purpose, and provided that the good is not available in the virtual repertoire for direct purchases enabled in the PUBLIC SHOPPING Portal.

The acquisition of medicines by this procedure will be within the current National Basic Medications Table. “[13] (highlighted out of text)

Although the Regulation uses the name “virtual repertoire” and not “electronic catalog” as happens in small amounts for other standardized goods, the fundamental requirement is the same: the good must not be available on the COMPRASPUBLICAS Portal for direct purchases. Additionally, the Regulation clarifies that only the medicines that appear in the current National Basic Medicines Table may be purchased.

Therefore, the small amount of medicines comes when the good: (i) is not available in the virtual repertoire enabled in the COMPRASPUBLICAS Portal (hereinafter, the “Directory”); (ii) is included in the current National Basic Medicine Chart; and (iii) the amount of the contract does not exceed the established limit.   

Reforms[14] to the Regulation and Codification provide that the contracting entities of the Integrated Public Health Network[15] (hereinafter, “RPIS”) have the obligation to contract storage and distribution and delivery or dispensing services of medicines, prior to their acquisition (hereinafter, the “Services”).  

So far, the Services have not been contracted by the RPIS. However, when this happens and the SERCOP communicates it[16] on the COMPRASPUBLICAS Portal,  Chapter II of Section III of Chapter II of Title VIII of the Codification will come into force. It contemplates specific regulations that all public entities must comply with to acquire medicines for a small amount. Among the new provisions, the following stand out: 

  1. The circumstances are established for the small amount to proceed, according to the contracting entity: 
  1. For RPIS entities, it proceeds when the medicines are not available in the Directory. In this case, the contracting of the Services is not mandatory, so the cost of the delivery-receipt of the medicines must be included in the acquisition.
  • For other public entities, it is appropriate if the medicine has not been contemplated in the annual planning or, if it has been included, it does not constitute a constant and recurring requirement during the year, that can be consolidated in a contract whose amount exceeds the maximum allowed.
  1. The contracting entities, through electronic means, may invite various suppliers, whether natural or legal persons, national or foreign, as well as their associations or consortiums. In the invitation, the entities must include the technical specifications of the medicine and the delivery conditions.
  1. The entities must have at least three offers, prior to selecting the supplier. If this is not possible, the entity must justify that it carried out all the actions and requirements necessary for this purpose.
  1. Invited providers, who do not necessarily have to be registered in the RUP, must necessarily present the medicine’s marketing authorization.

Until these regulations come into force, the provisions developed at the beginning of this article must be applied. Notwithstanding this, the SERCOP has established that, during this transition period, the contracting entities of the RPIS may carry out various small amounts of medicines in the year and their total amount may exceed the maximum value, provided that“… due to external factors, outside of the contracting entity duly justified, the contracting cannot be consolidated to use a contracting procedure under a common or special regime, other than the Small Amount. “[17]

Additionally, as of August 10, 2021, according to the fifth[18]  and tenth[19] reformed provisions of the Organic Law Reform of the Organic Criminal Code on Anti-Corruption, all public entities must obtain a prior report of relevance and favorability from the State Comptroller General to celebrate the small amount and any other contract under the LOSCNP.  

In conclusion, the acquisition of medicines for a small amount is exceptional and is subject to specific requirements. However, the dispersion of the applicable norms and their constant reforms generate confusion and an inappropriate use of this figure. For this reason, suppliers must be duly informed to avoid risks in the conclusion or execution of contracts, as well as in subsequent controls by the competent bodies.

[1] When speaking of “public entities”, reference will be made to those provided for in article 1 of the LOSCNP.

[2] According to Article 42 of the Regulation, standardized goods and services are “… those whose characteristics or technical specifications… are homogeneous and comparable under equal conditions”.

[3] In accordance with numeral 3 of article 6 of the LOSNCP, the electronic catalog is the registry of standardized goods and services published on the COMPRASPUBLICAS Portal for direct contracting.

[4] Codification and Updating of Resolutions issued by the National Public Procurement Service, Official Registry 245, January 29, 2018, Art. 330, no. 4.

[5] Organic Law of the National Public Procurement System, Official Registry 395, August 4, 2008, Art. 22.

[6] The COMPRASPUBLICAS Portal is the Official Computer System of Public Procurement of the Ecuadorian State, as provided in numeral 25 of article 6 of the LOSCNP.

[7] Numeral 29 of article 6 of the LOSCNP, defines the Unique Registry of Suppliers or RUP as “… the Database of the suppliers of works, goods and services, including consulting services, authorized to participate in the procedures established in this Law . “

[8] Codification and Updating of the Resolutions issued by the National Public Procurement Service, Official Registry 245, January 29, 2018, Art. 336.

[9] Regulation to the Organic Law of the National Public Procurement System, Official Registry 588, May 12, 2009, Art. 60.

[10] Numeral 2 of article 330 of the Codification provides that “Contracts for Small Amounts must not be used as a means of circumventing pre-contractual procedures.”.

[11] For example: leasing of goods, acquisition of fuels in operations of the entity, purchase of air tickets, contracting of travel agencies, acquisition of spare parts or accessories, among others.

[12]Art. 52.1.-Contracts of a small amount.- It may be contracted under this system in any of the following cases: […] 2.-Contracts for the acquisition of goods or provision of standardized services, except consulting, which do not appear in the electronic catalog and whose amount is less than multiplying the coefficient 0.0000002 of the initial budget of the State of the corresponding fiscal year… ”

[13] Regulation to the Organic Law of the National Public Procurement System, Official Registry 588, May 12, 2009, Art. 85.4.

[14] In this regard, Executive Decree No. 1033, published in Official Registry No. 208 of May 21, 2020, Section II of Chapter VII of Title III of the Regulations was amended; Resolution No. RE-SERCOP-2020-0111, published in the Official Registry Special Edition No. 1078 of September 28, 2020; and Resolution No. RE-SERCOP-2021-0114 published in Official Registry No. 432 of April 15, 2021.

[15] “… Made up of the set of public institutions that provide health services and which are known as << health subsystems >>, made up of the MSP, the IESS, the Social Security Institute of the National Police (ISSPOL) , ISSFA and the Complementary Health Network ”. Ecuador Constitutional Court of Ecuador, “Sentence No.: 679-18-JP / 20 and accumulated”, in Judgment No.: 679-18-JP and accumulated, August 5, 2020, 17.

[16] Codification and Updating of the Resolutions issued by the National Public Procurement Service, Official Registry 245, January 29, 2018, Twenty-fifth Transitory Provision.

[17] Codification and Updating of Resolutions issued by the National Public Procurement Service, Official Registry 245, January 29, 2018, Twenty-eighth Transitory Provision, no. 3.

[18] “… In the event of determining the relevance and favorability … the rest of the procedure established for this purpose in the law may be continued on a regular basis …”

[19] “… The Office of the Comptroller General of the State will issue a report of relevance, as a prerequisite for the signing of the public procurement processes determined in the law on the matter, by public sector entities and agencies …”

Mario Fernández García
Asocciate at CorralRosales
mfernandez@corralrosales.com

LexLatin – Ecuador brings its new personal data law to international standards

LexLatin - Ecuador brings its new personal data law to international standards - CorralRosales - Lawyers Ecuador

DETAILS

DATE: 27-05-2021

CORRALROSALES IN THE NEWS:

Rafael Serrano

MEDIA: LexLatin

Ecuador will publish in the coming days its first Personal Data Protection Law in the most European style after a long time working on it.  Our senior associate Rafael Serrano writes about it in LexLatin.

This great advance for Ecuador, although the right was guaranteed since 2008 but without a norm that would regulate it, will allow companies to have a refined database with globally homogenized standards and, above all, to have greater protection of the personal information.

In the words of Rafael Serrano, “it is about establishing a framework of parameters to process correct information”.

All those people who store information that identifies or makes any individual identifiable, directly or indirectly, and in any type of support, will be affected by this rule.

To review whether the law is being complied with, a personal data protection authority has been created. “If the president does not veto the project, this authority, the Superintendency, will be independent and with overseeing power in both the private and the public sectors,” adds Serrano.

In addition, this law has established parameters for international communications and transfers with personal data. It has also stablished rights so that consultation, digital education, and girls, boys and adolescents would not be the subject of a decision based solely or partially on automated valuations.

Serrano points out, “one of the most discussed issues was whether or not there was a need to create a record of the databases in the possession of those responsible. This does not mean that this information is delivered to the Superintendency to create a large database, but rather that what is delivered responds to statistical purposes: for example, what data is being processed and how many databases are there”.

The law establishes that the consent for a person to be registered in a database will only be valid when it is manifested freely, specifically, informed and unequivocally.

Information from companies to the owner of personal data

As Serrano explains, the information required by companies is “the purpose of the data treatment, the legal basis, the types of treatment that exist, the time of their conservation, the existence of a database , the purposes, a contact person in charge, the transfers that are intended to be made and the existence of automated evaluations and decisions, among others”.

“Those responsible for the processing of personal data are obliged to sign confidentiality contracts and proper handling of personal data with the person in charge and the staff in charge of the processing of such personal data or whoever has knowledge of the personal data, in addition to using technologies to mitigate and evaluate the performance or the violations that their protection mechanisms may have ”, concludes Serrano.

If you want to see the article, click here

AIPPI – Mandatory licensing of pharmaceutical patents in Andean countries

AIPPI - Mandatory licensing of pharmaceutical patents in Andean countries - CorralRosales - Lawyers Ecuador

DETAILS

DATE: 25-05-2021

CORRALROSALES IN THE NEWS:

María Cecilia Romoleroux

Gabriel Kuri

MEDIA: AIPPI

Pharmaceutical patent licenses are generally granted by means of agreements freely executed between the patent holder and the person authorized to exploit the invention. However, this is not always the case, since in some exceptional cases, they are granted by order of the authority under the conditions set forth in the Law. Our partner, María Cecilia Romoleroux, and our professional technician, Gabriel Kuri, write about this for AIPPI Ecuador.

The Commission of the Andean Community of Nations -CAN- provides for the granting of compulsory licenses for reasons of public interest, emergency or national security, if there are practices that affect free competition, and when requested by the holder of a patent, provided that it necessarily requires the use of another patent. This requires the prior notice to the licensee, whenever possible, and a specification of the period for which it is granted, the object of the license, the amount, and the conditions of the financial consideration. 

In 2009, the Ecuadorian Government declared access to medicines used in the treatment of certain diseases that affect the population and that are a priority for public health, as a matter of public interest. As a consequence, it declared the possibility of granting compulsory licenses. “In addition, it declared that, in principle, all medicines and agrochemicals would be subject to compulsory licensing as there are basic concepts that prevail over commercial interests,” add our experts.

For this reason, while recognizing the right of each country to order compulsory licenses for patent-based medicines under the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), Ecuador declared access to medicines used in the treatment of priority diseases to be in the public interest.

Last March 2021, the Andean Court of Justice issued a preliminary ruling (interpretación prejudicial) stating that ” among the situations in which the competent national offices have the power to grant compulsory licenses, are those related to reasons of public interest, emergency, or national security “, they add. Therefore, the granting of a compulsory license does not affect the right of the patent holder to continue exploiting the patent.

Our experts, based on their experience, state that “the granting of a compulsory license requires that the competent authority of the Member Country evidences, explains and adequately and sufficiently substantiates the reasons of public interest, emergency or national security, as well as the need to adopt such measure, which must meet three reasonableness requirements”. “It must also substantiate the reasons that justify that, under these circumstances, it is essential to grant a compulsory license.”

“The preliminary ruling clearly establishes that it is not enough to simply state one or more  conditions included in Article 65 of Decision 486, but that these must be explained, detailed and even individualized for each case,” they conclude.

If you want to see the article, click here

ASIPI Seminar | Beyond a year of change

ASIPI Seminar | Beyond a Year of Change - CorralRosales - Lawyer Ecuador

CorralRosales will participate in the next seminar organized by the Inter-American Association of Intellectual Property (ASIPI), titled “Beyond a year of change“, which will take place from May 23 to 25, 2021.

The most important Intellectual Property association in Latin America is organizing this event, which will be held online through an innovative platform, in which all members will be able to participate free of charge.  

The academic program will address current topics, as well as networking activities, which will involve a high level of participation.

Academic Program

Sunday, May 23 2021

  • 09:00h. – 12:00h. EST-USA: Administrative Council Meeting (for ASIPI members only)

Monday, May 24 2021

  • 08:00h. – 09:00h. EST-USA: ASIPIfit
  • 10:00h. – 10:20h.  EST-USA: Opening
  • 10:20h. – 10:50h. EST-USA: Opening Keynote Speaker – How Will AI shape the future of the IP system?
  • 11:00h. – 12:15h. EST-USA: Key Note Panel: Social platforms and freedom of speech, what is the right balance and should social platforms be entitled to censor speech?
  • 14:30h. – 16:00h. EST-USA: New road ahead for patentability of a new wave of technologies
  • 14:30h. – 16:00h. EST-USA: Trademarks as a living organism
  • 16:30h. – 17:30h. EST-USA: ASIPI CLUB: Brainstorm IP
  • 16:30h. – 17:30h. EST-USA: ASIPI CLUB: Regions and Gastronomy
  • 16:30h. – 17:30h. EST-USA: ASIPI CLUB: Books
  • 17:30h. – 18:30h. EST-USA ASIPI CLUB: Movies/series
  • 17:30h. – 18:30h. EST-USA: ASIPI CLUB: Wine
  • 17:30h. – 18:30h. EST-USA: ASIPI CLUB: E-sports and videogames
  • 19:00h. – 20h. EST-USA: Bingo

Tuesday, May 25 2021

  • 08:30h. – 09:00h. EST-USA: ASIPIfit
  • 10:00h. – 11:00h. EST-USA: CEJ Meeting/ Working Committee Presidents and Secretaries and Special Commissions
  • 11:30h. – 12:30h. EST – USA: Key Note Panel: New Intellectual Property Issues for Tech Startups in Latin America
  • 14:15h. – 15:45h. EST-USA: The new reality of the justice system
  • 14:15h. – 15:45h. EST-USA: Compulsory Patent Licenses in the Context of the COVID 19 Pandemic
  • 16:00h. – 17:30h. EST-USA: The new music industry
  • 16:00h. – 17:30h. EST-USA: The new vision for law firm management, what’s next?
  • 17:45h. – 18:30h. EST-USA: Non-Fungible Token’s – The New Crypto Storm
  • 18:30h. – 18:30h. EST-USA: DJ Closing

CorralRosales Will participate as a golden sponsor, register and don´t miss it! You can do so by clicking here.

World Trademark Review – Contradictory criteria for the examination of trademarks in similar cases in the Andean Community

World Trademark Review - Contradictory Criteria for the Examination of Trademarks in Similar Cases in the Andean Community - CorralRosales - Lawyer Ecuador

DETAILS

DATE: 11-05-2021

CORRALROSALES IN THE NEWS:

Andrea Miño Moncayo

Our associate Andrea Miño, specialist in Intellectual Property, has published a new article in  World Trademark Review on the contradictory criteria for the examination of trademarks in similar cases in the Andean Community.

In the words of our expert, “It’s the principles of primacy and direct effect on the obligation of member states to optimize the specialized legal system to ensure strict and uniform compliance with Andean community regulations. At the same time, the principle of autonomy empowers the competent offices to issue resolutions without affecting the decisions adopted by other member countries or their own; however, the decisions must be issued in strict adherence to what is established in the regulations and jurisprudence that governs the trademark area at the community level”.

Taking this context into account, the decisions issued by the IP offices of Ecuador, Colombia and Peru should be analyzed, since the criteria given are contradictory for the registrability of the same trademark intended to cover identical products.

Our associate also states in this publication that “In the case of Ecuador, Resolution No. 0004531, the National Industrial Property Directorate of the National Intellectual Rights Service (SENADI), determined that the same trademark, which protected class 5 products, did not meet the requirements for registration, since it was included in one of the grounds for refusal of registration provided for in the Andean Community regulations; that is, the trademark made direct reference to the products it intended to identify”.

SENADI, however, ignored the mixed nature of the trademark and only established that the trademark applied for “was not distinctive because it was a generic and descriptive term, and commonly used.”

If you want to see the article (under registration), click here

Enfoque – Customer service and experience

Enfoque - Customer service and experience - Lawyers Ecuador - CorralRosales

DETAILS

DATE: 20-04-2021

MEDIA: Enfoque

Our firm, CorralRosales, reappears in the media as one of the renowned law firms in Ecuador. This time, Enfoque Magazine publishes an article on the legal firms that focus on the traits most required by companies and individuals when hiring a legal service, such as proven experience, track record, good reputation, and knowledge of the sector. The article dedicates a few lines to CorralRosales in these areas.

With more than 40 years in the market and extensive experience in areas like aeronautical, banking and financial, foreign trade, corporate, public procurement, commercial, competition, mergers and acquisitions, labor, dispute resolution, intellectual property, data protection, and tax and customs, CorralRosales has appeared this year in the most prestigious rankings of international directories, such as Chambers & Partners, Legal 500, and IFLR100. We have also been part of the specialized publications IP Stars and WTR and referenced by Enfecto Magazine.

Our recognitions and good work in the workplace have allowed us to be part of the international network TAGLaw and the specialized association L2B Aviation.

In the words of our partner Xavier Rosales, “Our firm provided the constructor of the Quito Metro project as well as the contractor of the Puerto Bolivar port terminal sound advice.” “On other issues, such as intellectual property, we recently achieved the most important border measure in the history of the country when SENADI confirmed the adoption of said measure regarding the import of a container with more than 600,000 counterfeit products of different brands… Fighting piracy has become a way of life for us”, adds Rosales.

Enfoque Magazine also echoes the great team that makes up our firm. “CorralRosales has approximately 40 lawyers and five professional technicians in offices in Quito and Guayaquil,” they added.

If you want to see the article, click here.

CorralRosales among the five most popular firms in Ecuador employed by International Legal Management Offices

CorralRosales among the five most popular firms in Ecuador employed by International Legal Management Offices

DETAILS

DATE: 07-04-2021

MEDIA: Latin Lawyer

The prestigious Latin Lawyer media has published its latest report entitled: “Who Represents Latin America’s Biggest Companies?”. CorralRosales stands out among the five most popular firms in Ecuador employed by legal management offices in the last year.

In recent months, and because of the COVID-19 pandemic, law firms have had to adapt to a new and complex situation. They have seen their customer relationships and expectations change. During 2020, external lawyers have been an important help for the companies’ legal services. CorralRosales has undoubtedly adapted to the “new normal” and Latin Lawyer acknowledges this in its recent yearly report.

Our firm, CorralRosales, appears among the most popular Ecuadorian firms along with other large law offices. For this report, an investigation is carried out by LACCA (Latin America Corporate Counsel Association), based on the 100 firms with the highest income in the region. The initial sorting order considers income for the last full year, headquarters and their subsidiaries as a whole, news and articles on agreements and cases related to these firms.

CorralRosales is proud to appear in this renowned Latin Lawyer report. We thank all those who have made it possible for our firm to continue growing. We will keep working hard to provide our customers with the best service.

Thanks again. Congratulations team!

If you want to see the article (under registration), click here.

Regulations issued by the superintendency for the control of market power

regulations-issued-by-the-superintendency-for-the-control-of-market-power
Three regulations were issued by the Antitrust Authority (“SCPM”) and published in the Supplement of Official Gazette No. 374.
1. Reform of the Guidelines for Administrative Procedures:
(i) Regulates the process of meetings that precede the mandatory filing for antitrust clearance of economic concentration operations, determining that the meetings will be recorded and do not exempt the applicant from submitting the notification within 8 calendar days after the conclusion of the agreement leading to the economic concentration operation.
(ii) It establishes specific times for analysis by the National Intendancy for Control of Economic Concentrations (in the investigation stage) and in the Resolution Board (in the resolution stage), both in Phase 1 (resolution within 25 business days following the declaration of completeness of the filing) or Phase 2 processes (resolution within 60 business days following the declaration of completeness of the filing).
(iii) Determines the criteria to be considered by the National Intendancy for Control of Economic Concentrations to evaluate the innocuousness of an economic concentration operation and based on this, the determination of a resolution in Phase 1 or Phase 2.
(iv) Regulates information requests and the sanctioning procedure applicable for infractions of the Organic Law for Regulation and Control of Market Power that do not constitute anticompetitive practices (for example: breach of duty to collaborate, non-delivery of information required in the times and form determined by the Antitrust Authority, or failure to comply with corrective measures).
(v) Modifies the disposition and evaluation of corrective measures regime. The most relevant change being that the implementation of corrective measures is not mandatory every time a sanction is imposed, but that these measures will be imposed only when they are deemed necessary to restore the market.
2. Guidelines for the identification and review of regulatory barriers
Regulates the procedure to be applied by the National Competition Advocacy Office for the identification and review of regulations that impose illegitimate or disproportionate restrictions/entry barriers. This procedure, which can only be initiated by the SCPM´s own decision, has a maximum duration of 90 days from the date when the start of the analysis is resolved.
The legal review is composed of two stages: (i) a legality analysis by which the authority´s competence to issue the regulation under review, and (ii) a review of the consistency of said regulation with the existing regulation considering the hierarchy of norms.
If the reviewed regulation passes the legal analysis, the reasonableness and proportionality of the restriction it imposes will be analyzed in the second stage, weighed against the protected legal asset: the public interest. For this analysis, its suitability, necessity, and proportionality in the strict sense must be determined.
If it is determined after these analyses that the reviewed regulation is illegal or that it imposes an unreasonable barrier to entry, the Antitrust Authority will propose to the issuing Authority its elimination or modifications aimed to correct the undesirable effects.
3. Comprehensive modification of the guidelines for the filing fee for review of economic concentration operations
Prior to this modification, the fee to be paid for the analysis of economic concentration operations was determined based on the financial statements of the immediately preceding fiscal year of the entity over which the change of control that gives rise to the economic concentration operation falls. It corresponded to the highest resulting value of the following alternatives:
  • 0.25% of income tax
  • 0.005% of total revenue
  • 0.01% of the asset value
  • 0.05% of equity
With the modification (i) the calculation method is simplified with the determination of a base fee that will be defined on a yearly basis by the SCPM, based on the real costs of the analysis of economic concentration operations and (ii) solves the inconvenience for operations submitted from January to April of each year, period in which there are no audited financial statements, by expanding the possibility of calculating the fee based on the financial statements of the second immediately preceding year.
The simplification of the calculation occurs as follows:
(i) Considers a scale for applying the base fee, which is applied only based on the income of the entity that bears the change of control that gives rise to the economic concentration operation:

(ii) Determines that the rate applicable to the analysis of economic concentration operations notified for information purposes (not mandatory filing) is half the base fee, regardless of the value of the total revenue.

(iii) Allows payment via wire transfer.

Do you want to receive our newsletters with information like the one you just read?
Click here and subscribe.

DISCLAIMER: The previous text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not responsible for any loss or damage caused as a result of having acted or stopped acting based on the information contained in this document. Any additional determined situation requires the specific opinion and concept of the firm.

CORRALROSALES

Temporary Tax

temporary-tax

Regulation NAC-DGERCGC 20-00000004 issued by the Internal Revenue Service and published on January 29, 2020 in the Supplement of the Official Registry 131 establishes the procedure for filing the tax return and paying the temporary tax.

The Regulation establishes that the temporary tax that must be paid on an annual basis on the fiscal years 2020, 2021 and 2022.

The taxable base is equal to the income obtained on the fiscal year 2018 -as registered in the income tax return or as established by the Tax Administration within an assessment procedure- less the exempt income and income not subject to income tax. To this amount the taxpayer should add or deduct, as appropriate, the adjustments for deferred taxes registered in the same fiscal year.

The following rates must be applied to the taxable base:

Taxable income from 

Taxable income until

Tax rate US$1.000.000,00 US$5.000.000,00 0,10% US$5.000.001,00 US$10.000.000,00 0,15% US$10.000.001,00 Forward 0,20%

The value of annual each contribution cannot exceed 25% of the income tax generated in the fiscal year 2018.

Those taxpayers who did not generate income tax in the fiscal year 2018 are not required to file and pay the temporary tax return. The advanced income tax shall not be considered if the amount was higher than the income tax generated.

If the amount of the taxable income or the amount of the income tax declared in the income tax return filed for the fiscal year 2018 changes, a substitute tax return must be submitted.

If the entity is liquidated before the date on which the temporary tax return must be filed, the tax must be paid in advance with respect to the fiscal year in which the liquidation takes place. Entities liquidated until December 31, 2019 are not required to pay the temporary tax.

CORRALROSALES

Do you want to receive our newsletters with information like the one you just read?
Click here and subscribe.

The use of cannabis has been approved in Ecuador

cannabis-regulatory-approved

In the 1st Supplement of the Official Gazette No. 107 of December 24, 2019, the Reform of the Criminal Law was published, which will enter into force in June 21, 2020.

Included among the reforms, is the decriminalization of possession of drugs that contain cannabis or derivatives as their active ingredient for therapeutic, palliative or medicinal ends, or for the practice of alternative medicine. In addition, the Law of  Control and  Prevention of the use of  Drugs   has been amended, excluding non-psychoactive or hemp cannabis from control, extended to the cannabis plant or any part of the plant, whose delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content is less than 1%.

The Ministry of Agriculture will have 120 days from the entry into force of this law to issue the regulations to control the import, planting, cultivation, harvest, sale, industrialization and exportation of industrial hemp. Furthermore, shortly the National Assembly must approve the Health Law, in which cannabis and its derivatives for medicinal and therapeutic use will be regulated.

CORRALROSALES