Caterpillar successfully opposes the registration of FUNKY CAT based on its CAT marks – WTR

Recorte del artículo sobre "Caterpillar se opone con éxito al registro de FUNKY CAT basado en su marca CAT" en WTR

DETAILS

DATE: 18-01-2023

CORRALROSALES IN THE NEWS:

-Katherine González

The National Service of Intellectual Rights (SENADI) has declared, after resolving three oppositions against applications for trademark FUNKY CAT in classes 9, 35 and 37, that said trademark is not registrable. The reason: there is a risk of confusion or association with the CAT trademark. In this case, our associate Katherine González H. writes for World Trademark Review (WTR).

On December 22, 2021, Great Wall Motor Company Limited filed applications for registration of mark FUNKY CAT. Caterpillar Inc. filed oppositions based on its trademark CAT in several classes and also claimed that its trademark CAT is well-known.

On June 7, 2022, Great Wall Motor answered the oppositions and claimed that the applied-for marks were distinctive enough, insisting on the oppositions to be rejected and the applications granted.

FUNKY CAT registration resolution

Our associate explains that, through Resolutions No. 2000627, 2000632 and 2000631, SENADI accepted the oppositions and rejected the registration of trademark FUNKY CAT in Classes 9, 35 and 37.

SENADI argued that consumers could be confused between the goods and services offered by each company, as there are similarities between the conflicting marks, and “could be led to believe that they are provided by the same company.” SENADI concluded that there is a high risk of confusion or association and accepted the oppositions. It also considered that the inclusion of the term “Funky” was not sufficient to avoid the likelihood of confusion among consumers.

González concludes her analysis with an interesting comment: “Besides recognizing the opposing’s party’s rights, avoiding registration of similar trademarks, these cases are interesting, since usually the Ecuadorian IP Office tends to dismiss oppositions just based on the coexistence of the conflicting word in the relevant classes. However, in these cases the IP Office did not focus on this aspect and considered the overall similarities between the conflicting marks as a whole, as ordered by the Court of Justice of the Andean Community.”

If you want to read the full article (under subscription), click here.

74.1% of the investment in Ecuador comes from national capital – El Comercio

Recorte de El Comercio de un artículo en el que se menciona a Andrea Moya, socia de CorralRosales

DETAILS

DATE: 11-10-2022

CORRALROSALES IN THE NEWS:

-Andrea Moya

MEDIA:

El Comercio

In the first quarter of 2022, Ecuador approved 27 investment contracts. Of these, 74.1% corresponds to national investment and 25.9% to mixed investment (national and foreign). According to the Ministry of Production, Trade, Foreign Trade, Investment and Fisheries, the total amount reached USD 420 million, which represents an 86% increase in local investment in relation to the same period of 2021.

The media El Comercio attended a breakfast organized by CorralRosales and Softlanding in which our partner Andrea Moya and the Undersecretary of Investment of the Ministry of Production, Marco Moya gave a talk on the subject.

As Marco Moya explains, “with the signing of investment contracts, a company commits to make new investments and the State provides legal certainty. This applies to any sector of the economy. The main objective is to increase production in Ecuador and generate employment”.

It is important to know that these contracts grant tax incentives to new investments, such as a five-point reduction in the income tax rate, exemption from foreign exchange tax (ISD) and foreign trade taxes on the import of raw materials and capital goods necessary for the execution of the investment.

Our partner, as an expert in investment contracts, explains that “these benefits and incentives apply for the duration of the contract and must not exceed the amount of the investment”. “The agriculture, livestock, forestry and fishing, manufacturing, and transportation and storage sectors account for 91% of the investment contracts approved in the first quarter of 2022,” she adds.

If you want to read the full article, click here.

SENADI refuses to register mark in Class 41 on the ground that it would affect Netflix´s rights – WTR

Recorte del artículo "El SENADI deniega el registro de la marca en la clase 41 por afectar a los derechos de Netflix", escrito por Katherine González, asociada de CorralRosales, para el medio WTR

DETAILS

DATE: 12-09-2022

PROFESSIONALS IN THE NEWS:

-Katherine González

MEDIA:

WTR

“In the opposition proceeding against the application for the trademark CHOLOFLIX in class 41, the National Service of Intellectual Rights of Ecuador (SENADI) has considered that the trademark was not registrable because there is a risk of confusion or association on the part of consumers. This is due to the existence of the trademark NETFLIX of Netflix Inc in class 41″. This is how the article written by our associate Katherine González H. for WTR opens -wherein she covers the reasons behind the decision.

The process began on May 21, 2020, when a natural person applied for registration of the trademark CHOLOFLIX for services in class 41, specifically: “education; training; entertainment; sporting and cultural activities; supply of films, not downloadable, by means of video on demand services; supply of television programs, not downloadable, by means of video on demand services; distribution of films; entertainment services.

Netflix, in the face of this, filed an opposition based on the trademark NETFLIX, which covers the following aspects of class 41:

“Entertainment services; information on entertainment activities; production of films other than for advertising; provision of films and television programs that are not downloadable via video on demand streaming services”, among other.

In addition, the entertainment company NETFLIX claimed that it was already known to a lot of population. In the counterclaim, the plaintiff replied on February 8, 2021, claiming that NETFLIX was a weak mark and therefore did not have distinctive character. It requested, therefore, that the opposition be dismissed and the application be granted.

On July 18, 2022, SENADI issued Resolution No. 2000254, whereby it accepted the opposition and rejected the registration of the trademark CHOLOFLIX. It also pointed out that it would be difficult for consumers to easily differentiate the services offered with similar names and that they could consider that the conflicting services were provided by the same company; therefore, there was a risk of confusion or association.

Our associate has added the following comment in conclusion: “although SENADI accepted NETFLIX’s opposition and rejected a detailed analysis of the similarities between the trademarks, as well as the identity of the services in question, there was no analysis – nor mention – of the well-known character of the NETFLIX trademark alleged by NETFLIX. Although SENADI has improved its analysis in trademark oppositions compared to previous years, the motivation is still insufficient as it does not make an exhaustive assessment of all the arguments raised by the parties. This assessment is especially important in opposition proceedings, where third party rights are at stake.”

If you want to read the full article (under registration), click here.

Competition and antitrust: evaluation of regulatory barriers – Industria Legal

Foto de Ana Samudio, asociada de CorralRosales, más el logo de CorralRosales y un trozo de su último artículo en la revista Industria Legal

DETAILS

DATE: 24-08-2022

PROFESSIONALS IN THE NEWS:

-Ana Samudio

MEDIA:

Industria Legal

“The Superintendence of Market Power Control (SCPM by its Spanish initials) has analyzed regulatory provisions that could constitute regulatory barriers to entry and permanence in the market.” This is how Ana Samudio begins her latest article published in Industria Legal magazine, in which she addresses the issue of “evaluation of regulatory barriers” from the competition and antitrust standpoint.

As Samudio analyses in her article, “the Constitution recognizes the right of people to develop economic activities, individually or collectively, in accordance with the principles of solidarity, social and environmental responsibility; and the power of State intervention in economic activities to promote forms of production that ensure good living for the population and discourage those that violate their rights or the rights of nature”.

Therefore, this intervention is legitimate in the extent that a balance of these guarantees is achieved. In this way, any regulation that imposes restrictions on the entry and permanence of economic operators in the different markets must also be useful and sufficient, with the aim of always guaranteeing the public interest. They will also have to be reasonable and proportional, thus the development of efficient markets will take place.

Samudio concludes with the recommendations issued by the SCPM for the different markets:

  • “Hemp: the reasonableness of: (i) the norm that prevents natural persons from obtaining development licenses for activities associated with the production and commercialization of hemp has not been justified; and (ii) the norm that determines a minimum area for hemp cultivation; and the recommendations to the Ministry of Agriculture to review said regulations, so that the entry of economic operators in this market is not unjustifiably restricted.
  • Commercialization of automotive fuel: it was determined that the norm that requires an established network of -at least- 10 service stations to continue operating as a fuel distributor, has no technical support, therefore it constitutes an unjustified restriction to the number of economic operators that serve the automotive industry which harms competition. Consequently, it recommended the Agency for the Regulation and Control of Energy and Non-Renewable Natural Resources to remove this requirement.”

If you want to see the full video, click here.

The Organic Law of Personal Data Protection – Teleamazonas

Rafael Serrano, asociado de CorralRosales en Teleamazonas (vídeo subido a YouTube) más su logo

DETAILS

DATE: 15-06-2022

PROFESSIONALS IN THE NEWS:

-Rafael Serrano

MEDIA:

Teleamazonas

Ecuador celebrates the first year of the entry into force of the Organic Law on Personal Data Protection. For this reason, the media Teleamazonas has asked our senior associate Rafael Serrano about its regulations.

According to Serrano, also vice-president of the Ecuadorian Data Protection Association (AEPD), “the Data Protection Law was published on May 26, 2021, and came into force at that time, only leaving two years for the sanctioning regime to come into force. Two years of latency, we could say. During this period, the aim was for both the private and public sectors to develop their capacities to adapt to the Law, since this implies a process of cultural changes”.

Our associate also adds that “the Law is created and a new entity is created, which is the Superintendence of Data Protection. The Council of Citizen Participation has approved the regulations of the contest for the appointment of the Superintendent of Personal Data. Additionally, the overseers for the above mentioned contest have already been appointed. The executive must send the corresponding list of three candidates to appoint the authority”.

The news item explains the lack of adaptation by the public and private sectors to the Data Protection Law. This will be a problem since the application of the sanctioning regime will begin in one year and both the public and private sectors will require several actions to be in compliance.

“This is a regulation to both the private sector and the public sector, which will also have to adapt and begin to prepare for the provisions of the Law. The lack of an authority means that there is a lot of uncertainty about what is going to happen,” confirms Serrano.

If you want to see the full video, click here.

The price of a barrel of crude oil continues above USD 100 – Teleamazonas

Rafael Serrano, asociado senior de CorralRosales, entrevistado por una periodista de Teleamazonas para hablar sobre el precio del barril de crudo en Ecuador - Vídeo subido a YouTube

DETAILS

DATE: 12-04-2022

PROFESSIONALS IN THE NEWS:

-Rafael Serrano

MEDIA:

Teleamazonas

In Ecuador, the increase in the price of oil leads to the fact that the income of resources to the Ecuadorian State remains in positive terms. The media Teleamazonas asks about this to our senior associate, Rafael Serrano, an expert lawyer in Energy issues, who considers that the trend of the international oil price will be maintained. Therefore, he believes it is important to consider other costs.

According to the Minister of Energy, Juan Carlos Bermeo, this does not mean that everything is income for the country, “because the increase in the price of oil means, in parallel, the increase in the price of fuels and what is required to import fuels, whether gasoline or diesel, is a greater amount of resources”.

Rafael Serrano, when asked about this matter, answers that “this for the country, obviously, will generate greater benefits, greater income, because a lower value was budgeted, but we also have to consider the increase in production costs in many areas: transportation costs, among others, which will make certain products more expensive”.

As a consequence of the above, the Government plans, among its future projects, a process of delegation to the private sector of the Esmeraldas Refinery. This is aimed at reducing the amount of waste and producing Euro 5 grade fuels. For this, the opinion of our expert is based on the fact that “seeking the help of the private sector through public-private alliances” is, in his opinion, “a very good mechanism to develop the Esmeraldas Refinery and to see alternatives that can be developed within the country to produce these derivatives here in Ecuador and thus make them cheaper”.

A greater use of associated gas is also expected for its use in electricity generation and industry, “cleaner and at a much lower cost”, adds the Minister.

If you want to see the full video, click here.

Controversial SENADI proceedings highlight need to fight corruption within the authority

Bandera de Ecuador ondeando como foto principal del artículo publicado por la asociada de CorralRosales Katherine González en el medio online WTR

DETAILS

DATE: 24-02-2022

PROFESSIONALS IN THE NEWS:

-Katherine González

MEDIA:

WTR

The National Intellectual Rights Service (SENADI hereinafter) in Ecuador is in the news for the questionable decision made when registering a trademark. Our associate Katherine González has written about this specific case for WTR, an article that we summarize below.

 On 10 June 2020, Quirovara Tax Company SA applied for the mark DON BENJA (and logo) in Class 31, specifically “bananas and Musaceae.” On the other hand, Arbelaez Valencia Hermanos Coffee Roaster Mejía SA filed an Andean opposition based on the trademark DON BENJA, which covers the following goods of Class 31: “agricultural, horticultural, forestry products and grains not included in other classes; live animals; fresh fruits and vegetables; natural plant and flower seeds; animal feed; malt.”

 In November, SENADI began its unusual registrability study: rejected the Andean opposition, and granted, to everyone’s surprise, the registration of DON BENJA trademark for class 31, in favor of Quirovara company. In its resolution, SENADI:

  • Accepted that the marks were similar;
  • Accepted that the marks protected the same goods;
  • Acting ex officio, and against the applicable Andean law, reviewed a webpage and used this information to determine the main economic activity of the opponent, ignoring the goods listed in the registration certificate that was the basis of the opposition; and
  • Accused the opponent of trying to arbitrarily extend the protection of its trademark in relation to its commercial activity, again ignoring the basis of the opposition and the protection granted by the trademark.

Regarding the registrability of trademarks, Article 136 of Decision 486 of the Andean Community establishes as follows:

“Those signs whose use in commerce unduly affects a third party’s right may not be registered as trademarks, in particular where:

  • They are identical or similar to a trademark previously applied for registration or registered by a third party, for the same products or services, or for products or services in respect of which the use of the trademark may cause a risk of confusion or association (…)

SENADI´s resolution

On 8 December 2021, SENADI issued a resolution stating that an adequate trademark comparison had not been carried out, and requested the highest administrative Authority, through an ex officio review procedure, to decide whether the applied-for mark should be granted. This request implies that the parties were denied appeal rights, as the appeal authority would already have issued a decision.” Katherine states.

Seven days later, SENADI annulled the office action as being “inadmissible”. It found that it contravened Article 76 of the Constitution. The next day, on December 16, 2021, through Resolution No SENADI-2021-RS-14973accepted the voluntary cancellation of the trademark DON BENJA by Quirovara. The cancellation request had been filed only the day before

This situation is surprising, since, as mentioned by our associate, “Usually, the voluntary cancellation process takes between six and 12 months; however, in this case, this request was submitted and accepted within 24 hours.” She also adds that “It is noteworthy that the agent who filed the mark in dispute was the SENADI director deciding on the matter, who immediately resigned after the resolution became public.”

Conclusion

For González, this case highlights the urgent need for SENADI to:

  • Train its officials so that all actions are carried out in accordance with national and Andean regulations;
  • Strictly apply the legal norm requiring the processing of cases in a chronological order; and
  • Fight strongly against corruption.

“If these recommendations are applied, it is expected that the negative impact on users will decrease considerably, the quality of SENADI’s decisions will improve, and its reputation will recover”, she concludes.

If you want to read the complete news (under registration), click here

Investments in Ecuador: implications of Law of Economic Development and Fiscal Sustainability

Inversiones en Ecuador - Implicaciones de la Ley de Desarrollo Económico y Sostenibilidad Fiscal - CorralRosales

DETAILS

DATE: 07-02-2022

PROFESSIONALS IN THE NEWS:

-Andrea Moya

MEDIA:

LexLatin

The new article published by LexLatin, where you can read the interview to Andrea Moya, our partner and leader of the tax area of the firm, discusses investments in Ecuador: implications of the Law of Economic Development and Fiscal Sustainability.

Objective of the Law of Economic Development and Fiscal Sustainability

Moya explains that the main objective of this Law, which is the only project of the Lasso administration that is in force, is to provide the State with additional resources with which to reduce the fiscal deficit and organize public finances. She adds that “temporary wealth taxes were established, a tax regime was created to regularize assets abroad, the income tax that will affect the highest income earners was increased (…) and certain elements of the same tax were simplified. These elements include the elimination of tax incentives for investments in basic industries, prioritized sectors and public-private alliances that had been created in previous years”.

What are the main challenges of the Law of Economic Development and Fiscal Sustainability, considering that we still have to deal with the pandemic?

Our partner answers this question by placing special emphasis on the fact that “it is important to distinguish the medium- and long-term objectives proposed by the Law, such as the organization of public finances in the face of current issues such as the pandemic”. To this she adds that the reduction of the fiscal deficit, ”is expected to boost the economy with the creation of quality employment, which is the greatest need of Ecuador”.

What are the main regulatory changes in customs and foreign trade that are implemented with this Law?

For Moya, the key is the exclusion of the value of freight for the calculation of customs duties. This was done to reduce its impact on the cost of imported goods and to curb the effect of the significant increase in freight rates in the world market. In addition, this Law, “includes reforms to reduce the time of administrative processes in charge of the Customs Authority, implement technological systems for customs control and the implementation of advance consultations to provide security to the importer on the treatment that will be given to the goods.

In this same area, the Government is negotiating several trade agreements with the objective of facilitating access to international markets for exports.

If you want to read the full article, click here

Industrial property and copyright in Ibero-America: trends for the third decade of the 21st century

Industrial property and copyright in Ibero-America: trends for the third decade of the 21st century - CorralRosales - Lawyers Ecuador

DETAILS

DATE: 20-12-2021

CORRALROSALES IN THE NEWS:

-Eduardo Ríos

-Miguel Maigualema

MEDIA:

– ASIPI

– AEPI

– Universidad del Rosario

– Colegio de Abogados Rosaristas

– Universidad Hemisferios

– Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina

– UIDE

CorralRosales Associates and specialists in Intellectual Property Eduardo Ríos and Miguel Maigualema participated in the writing of “Industrial Property and Copyright in Ibero-America”, which has been published by the Hemisferios University, Andean Community Court of Justice, International University of Ecuador, Rosario Bar Association, Rosario University, Ecuadorian Intellectual Property Association (AEPI) and ASIPI.

They wrote a complete chapter on “Legal Responses to Intellectual Property Rights Infringements in Ecuador”. Throughout the chapter, Ríos and Maigualema make a short introduction and then write, in detail, on the following topics:

  1. The existence of the Law
  2. The infringement action in the Andean Community
  3. Types of measures to face the improper use of Trademark Rights
  4. Amicable approach on Intellectual Property matters
  5. Mediation, as a dispute resolution mechanism in Intellectual Property matters
  6. Administrative action for violation of Intellectual Property Rights
  7. Civil actions for infringement of Intellectual Property Rights
  8. Criminal classification in the field of Intellectual Property
  9. Conclusion

Our experts want to take this opportunity to explain simply and directly the elements and circumstances that a holder of Intellectual Property Rights and their advisers must know and consider to face their improper use. Thus, they will be able to determine the actions to be followed and that the Law allows “identifying the conditions of the offenders”, as indicated in their introduction.

If you want to read the complete chapter, click here.

LexLatin – HIG Capital Becomes a Majority Shareholder in Ransa, from Grupo Romero

LexLatin - HIG Capital Becomes a Majority Shareholder in Ransa, from Grupo Romero - CorralRosales - Lawyers Ecuador

DETAILS

CorralRosales represented HIG Capital, an American alternative investment company, to become a majority shareholder in Ransa, a company dedicated to logistics services with a large presence in the Andean region and Central America.

The following CarralRosales’s Lawyers took part in the purchase and sale process during “Operation 1”: Partners Xavier Rosales and Andrea Moya, along with associates Milton Carrera, Ana Samudio, Rafael Serrano, Ramón Paz and Miño, Marta Villagómez, María Isabel Torres, Darío Escobar, Sofía Rosales and Edgar Bustamante.

According to the LexLatin medium, “the terms of the negotiation, signed on September 21 and closed on October 29, were not disclosed.” Grupo Romero, owner of Ransa, “will remain a strategic partner of the company.”

“The acquired companies are: Inversiones Logicorp, Ransa Comercial, Agencias Ransa and Almacenera del Perú (Perú); Ransa Operador Logístico Bolivia (Ransabol – Bolivia) and Logistics Operators of Central America (OLCA – Panama)”, according to Ingrid Rojas, a LexLatin journalist.

If you want to read the complete news, click here.