Foreign exchange tax paid regarded as income tax credit – Update of the list of subheadings

The Regulation CPT-RES-2023-00-1 issued on July 31, 2023, by the Tax Policy Committee (hereafter the “CPT“) amended the list of raw materials and capital goods which importation is subject to Foreign Exchange Tax (ISD) but may be used as a tax credit for the payment of Income Tax.

The following link shows the subheadings that are included and those that are excluded from the list:

CPT-RES-2023-001

The inclusion of subheadings is effective as of January 1st, 2023, and the exclusion of subheadings is effective as of August 1st, 2023.

 

Andrea Moya - CorralRosales - Lawyer Ecuador

Specialist in Tax Law
Andrea Moya, Partner at CorralRosales
amoya@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

Would you like to receive our newsletters with information like the one you have just read?
Click here and subscribe.

NOTE: The above text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not liable for any loss or damage incurred as a result of acting or failing to act on the basis of the information contained in this document. Any additional determined situation requires the specific opinion and concept of the firm in Quito / Guayaquil, Ecuador.

CORRALROSALES

Deducibility of remunerations and fees paid to legal representatives of entities

On July 20, 2023, the Department of Regulations and Consultations of the General Directorate of the Internal Revenue Service in response to Consultation No. 1170120230744808 issued Official Letter No. 91701202023OCON001932, in which it determines:

  • That according to the Labor Code and Circular No. NAC-DGECCGC22-00000004, issued by the Tax Administration, entities may maintain a labor or civil relationship with their Legal Representative.
  • In the case of Legal Representatives who maintain an employment relationship with the entity, the amounts for wages, salaries and other remunerations will be deductible if the payment of employer contributions to the Ecuadorian Institute of Social Security, is justified.
  • In the case of Legal Representatives who maintain a civil relationship with the entity, the respective fees will be deductible expenses when they are supported by invoices, issued in accordance with tax regulations, therefore, it is not necessary to pay employer contributions to the Ecuadorian Institute of Social Security.

 

Would you like to receive our newsletters with information like the one you have just read?
Click here and subscribe.

NOTE: The above text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not liable for any loss or damage incurred as a result of acting or failing to act on the basis of the information contained in this document. Any additional determined situation requires the specific opinion and concept of the firm in Quito / Guayaquil, Ecuador.

CORRALROSALES

New regulations for the importation of household goods and work equipment of returning migrants and foreigners

Resolution SENAE-SENAE-2023-0043-RE issued on July 19, 2023, and published in Official Gazette Supplement 362 of July 27, 2023, the National Customs Service of Ecuador established new regulations for the importation of goods under the exception regime for household goods and work equipment.

The most important reforms include:

  1. Alcoholic beverages are admissible if it does not exceed 50 liters in total and 2 liters for each commercial brand.
  2. Collectible goods that are not restricted according to the following list are admissible: https://www.aduana.gob.ec/gaceta-resolucion/SENAE-SENAE-2021-0131-RE/
  3. If the imported goods are not properly identified or do not match with the data registered in the list of goods subject to the exception regime, the returning migrant or foreigner will be subject to the payment of a fine. However, this will not prevent the importation process from continuing under the exception regime.
  4. The returning migrant or foreigner may reimport the household goods and work equipment that was definitively exported under the reimportation regime in the same condition. This regime is exempt from the payment of foreign trade taxes. The re-importation must be carried out within a period of 2 years from the date of shipment of the goods.
  5. The percentage of goods subject to prior inspection is reduced from 30% to 15%. The customs operating technician is able to review only 15% of the total amount of goods imported by the returning migrant.
  6.  For the import of used or new vehicles of the returning migrant, the following supporting documents may be attached to the customs declaration: i) the exports customs declaration made in the country of departure where the value of the vehicle is stated; or, ii) the certificate issued by the dealer or commercial house detailing the value of the vehicle.
  7. When the declared price for vehicles and motorcycles of the returning migrant is lower than the minimum values established by the Customs Authority, the Authority shall initiate a reasonable doubt procedure for the returned migrant to justify the price.
  8. Only foreign migrants may maintain the benefit of the exception regime when the interruption of their residence does not exceed 180 days as long as it is due to labor reasons.

The new regulations are effective from the date of publication in the Official Gazette, that is, from July 27, 2023. However, the new regulations will not be applicable to imports shipped prior to their publication in the Official Gazette, unless it benefits the migrant.

In the following link you can review the complete text of the Resolution:

https://www.aduana.gob.ec/gaceta-resolucion/SENAE-SENAE-2023-0043-RE/

Andrea-Moya-ConvertImage-1-300x300

Customs Law Specialist
Andrea Moya, Partner at CorralRosales
amoya@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

f163f1c8-9d63-6efb-1078-c8dc91448b91

Customs Law Specialist
Fernanda Inga, Senior Associate CorralRosales
finga@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

Would you like to receive our newsletters with information like the one you have just read?
Click here and suscribe.

NOTE: The above text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not liable for any loss or damage incurred as a result of acting or failing to act on the basis of the information contained in this document. Any additional determined situation requires the specific opinion and concept of the firm in Quito / Guayaquil, Ecuador.

CORRALROSALES

Ecuador: Well-known trademarks; reinforced protection against non-use cancellation actions

Once granted, a trademark gives its owner the exclusive right to prevent unauthorized third parties from using a similar trademark that could cause confusion and association among consumers. The owner is also obliged to use the trademark effectively in the market as registered and for the protected goods or services.

Unjustified non-use of the trademark may result in cancellation of the acquired right, which entitles a third party to file an action for cancellation for non-use.

Article 165 of Decision 486 does not make a specific distinction as to whether cancellation actions are appropriate in the case of well-known or renowned trademarks; however, the Andean Court of Justice has repeatedly stated in its jurisprudence that cancellation actions for lack of use are not suitable against a well-known trademark, due to the exceptional protection granted by Community regulations to this type of trademark.

The trademark’s well-known quality must have been declared and be in force in one of the member countries of the Andean Community, which implies the obligation of the owner to prove, before the competent IP Office, the facts proving the trademark’s reputation.

The National Service of Intellectual Rights by Resolution No. OCDI-2022-859, issued in November 2022, breaks the typical standards of evidence acceptance. The IP Office rejected the cancellation action filed against the trademark NOEL in international class No. 29 based on the well-known status, duly proven, of this trademark to protect “cookies” in international class No. 30.in order to guarantee the special protection of well-known trademarks.

The Ecuadorian IP Office stated that the well-known status of the trademark NOEL was demonstrated through declarations of notoriety issued by the Colombian IP Office during the relevant time frame for the cancellation action (three years before the filing of the action). The IP Office ratified the existence of a competitive connection between the goods for which well-known was declared (cookies IC. 30) and those that the trademark under cancellation protects (IC. 29) since there is a competitive connection between these goods

In this way, the IP Office ratified the special protection that well-known trademarks have in the Andean countries. Stating that this type of trademark breaks the principles of territoriality, registration, and real and effective use. It concluded that, in strict compliance with the applicable normative and jurisprudential precepts, it is not appropriate to analyze the cancellation for lack of use against well-known trademarks.

This decision sets a precedent for the protection of trademarks that, thanks to the prestige and positioning achieved in the market and the advertising efforts made by their owners, have obtained a well-known status in the Andean Community.

Andrea Miño
Associate at CorralRosales
andrea@corralrosales.com

Thresholds for the imports of textiles and its manufactured goods

The Ministerial Agreement MPCEIP-MPCEIP-2023-0030-A (the Regulation) issued on July 3, 2023, and published in the Official Gazette 355 of July 18 of the same year, the Ministry of Production, Foreign Trade, Investment and Fisheries established the parameters (thresholds) to strengthen the risk profile and customs control system against possible circumstances of customs fraud, money laundering and other illicit operations.

These thresholds will be applied to imports under a definitive importation regime (Regime 10) of textiles and its manufactured goods classified in chapters 52, 53, 54, 55, 55, 58, 60, 61, 62 and 63 of the National Tariff.

Annex 1 of the Regulation details the 527 tariff subheadings that will be subject to the special reasonable doubt procedure of the National Customs Service of Ecuador (SENAE), when the Authority verifies that the FOB value per kilo declared is less than or equal to the thresholds established for each subheading, which range between US$4.00 and US$20.00 per kilo.

Once the reasonable doubt procedure has been initiated, the importer is able to justify that the declared value is equal to the price actually paid or payable for the imported goods within 5 working days. This procedure is regulated in the “Specific Manual for Applying the Reasonable Doubt Procedure” which may be reviewed in the following link: https://www.aduana.gob.ec/gaceta-resolucion/SENAE-SENAE-2021-0050-RE/

The provisions of the Regulation must be implemented by SENAE within 60 days from its promulgation in the Official Gazette.

This measure is not applicable for imports made by Authorized Economic Operators (AEO), imports exempted from payment of foreign trade taxes, and imports shipped prior to the enactment of the Regulation.

The complete text of the Regulation may be review in the following link:

ACUERDO Nro. MPCEIP-MPCEIP-2023-0030-A

 

Would you like to receive our newsletters with information like the one you have just read?
Click here and subscribe.

NOTE: The above text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not liable for any loss or damage incurred as a result of acting or failing to act on the basis of the information contained in this document. Any additional determined situation requires the specific opinion and concept of the firm in Quito / Guayaquil, Ecuador.

CORRALROSALES

The Trademark Lawyer Magazine interviews our partner Maria Cecilia Romoleroux

DETAILS

DATE: 07-07-2023

PROFESSIONALS INVOLVED IN THE ARTICLE:

Maria Cecilia Romoleroux

The Trademark Lawyer Magazine interviews our partner Maria Cecilia Romoleroux in its section dedicated to women working in the Intellectual Property industry.

During the interview, Maria Cecilia talks about her experience, her achievements, the challenges she has faced during her professional career, as well as the changes she would like to see in the IP industry in the coming years.

An interview that, according to the publication, are inspirations, experiences and ideas for equality.

“A curious fact is that I didn’t want to be a lawyer, or at least it wasn’t in my plans. It all started when my aunt told me the news that I had been enrolled at the Law School. At first, I was shocked, as I had not planned it, but as time went by, I fell in love with my career and studied it with enthusiasm until the end. At that time, intellectual property was not very developed in Ecuador and it was not a main focus at the university”, explains Maria Cecilia recalling her beginnings.

Throughout my career, she says, “i have faced many challenges, most of them related to being a woman in a historically male-dominated environment. Still today, most law firms have a significant number of female associates or employees, but when we look at the partners, the number of women is low or none”.

“This reality is consequence of a sad but true fact: being a woman and a lawyer means that, by default, our path will always have more obstacles than our male colleagues. In my experience, the only way to deal with these and any other obstacles is to move forward. If I had spent time lamenting over all obstacles or taking criticism personally, I would never have achieved a quarter of what I have achieved in my professional and personal career”.

If you want to read the complete article, click here.

Regulation for public-private partnerships – Executive Decree 788

By Executive Decree number 788 issued on June 26, 2023 and published in Official Gazette Supplement 341 of June 28, 2023, the President of the Republic issued the Regulations for Public-Private Partnerships (“Regulation“), on which we highlight the following.

  1. Overview:

Scope: The Regulation applies to Public Private Partnership (“PPP“) projects carried out by the Central Government or by the Decentralized Autonomous Governments (“GAD“). This will allow GAD to implement delegation projects under this modality, which had occurred only by exception.

Definitions: The Regulation incorporates the definition of several elements necessary for all stages of the process of a PPP contract. Some of the most relevant definitions, due to their practical usefulness, are those related to the promotion, structuring, execution, financing and evaluation of PPP projects.

The measurement of progress or degree of compliance of the Private Manager of a PPP project must be related to performance indicators or KPIs (Key Performance Indicators). These indicators may be financial or non-financial.

Institutional framework: The Interinstitutional PPP Committee (“CIAPP“) is maintained as the entity in charge of the steering and regulation of PPPs. This entity is formed by the head of the Secretariat of Public-Private Investments (“SIPP“) -who will preside it and will have the casting vote- and the heads or delegates of the following institutions: the entity in charge of production and investments, who will be the vice-president; the Ministry of Economy and Finance (“MEF“); and the entity in charge of national planning. Its main functions are to issue policies and regulations regarding the promotion of investment through PPPs as well as to coordinate actions at the central administration level.

The SIPP is also maintained as an entity attached to the Presidency of the Republic to promote, facilitate, materialize and maintain investments derived from PPPs. The Regulations establish a list of functions of the SIPP, the requirements to be appointed and the functions of the Secretary of Public-Private Investments.

The Regulation determines the functions of the Delegating Entities, among which the following stand out: preparation of the Initial and Final Business Case, execution of the PPP contracts and everything related to the management of the PPP project phases. The Delegating Entities may transfer their functions to another public administration related to the object of the PPP project. This scheme will be financed from: the budget of the Delegating Entity or from the fiduciary business set up by the SIPP.  In both cases, a scheme for the recovery of costs and expenses by the successful bidder may be included; and, at the risk of the structurers, when the procedure concludes with a successful bidder and a mechanism has been established in the bidding conditions. In any case, the Delegating Entities must include in their budgets the necessary resources to comply with their obligations.

In the case of the GAD, they will exercise their institutional autonomy to assign competencies and budgets. They will require a preliminary report and opinion from the MEF when the PPP project requires any contribution from the General State Budget or when it requires the assumption of any contingent liability of the central public administration.

It also determines the functions to be performed by the MEF and the Private Manager, which must necessarily be a special purpose vehicle.

Principles: The Regulation establishes the following principles and guidelines applicable for all actors of a PPP project: integrity and probity, publicity; citizen participation, quality and efficiency, concurrence and environmental sustainability, among others. It also establishes criteria for coverage and social inclusion related to social groups, communities and nationalities, the hiring of human talent residing in the area of influence and the use of a national component in the development of PPP projects.

  1. About PPP Contracts

Definition: a PPP association is defined as a long-term delegated management contractual modality in which the experience, knowledge, equipment, technologies and technical and financial capacities of the private sector are incorporated, in order to fulfill one or several of the following activities: design, finance, build, improve, operate and maintain a new or existing public asset and/or provide the maintenance, administration and supplies of a public service. Under this scheme the risks are distributed between the parties, with the Private Manager assuming significant risks. The Private Manager’s consideration will be linked to its performance.

Classification: projects are classified as self-financed by the Private Manager and co-financed between the Private Manager and the Delegating Entity.

Duration and value: PPP contracts must have a term of between 5 and 30 years. Exceptionally, this term may be extended for 10 years. The minimum Total Value of a PPP project shall be US$ 20 million. In the case of the GAD it will be US$ 10 million.

Public Trust Funds: the Regulation creates the possibility for the State to have public trust funds for (i) financing preparation studies; (ii) fiscal risk coverage; (iii) liquidity to meet firm commitment obligations; and, (iv) others that the CIAPP resolves to promote the bankability of PPP projects. The assets may originate from the General State Budget, the private sector and/or reimbursable and non-reimbursable financing.

Stability and Incentives: legal stability will apply to sectoral and specific regulatory aspects declared as essential in a PPP contract. Tax incentives may be established in the investment contracts. Exemption from foreign trade taxes and foreign currency outflow taxes must be requested and justified by the Delegating Entity. Other tax incentives may be granted by the CIAPP.

  1. Economic-financial regime and risk allocation

Project revenues and compensation: the Private Manager will be paid through public resources, payments made by the users, payments derived from the commercial exploitation of the project or a combination of the above. In projects related to new or existing public infrastructure, payment by the Private Manager in favor of the Delegating Entity may be determined. Revenues and expenses will be administered through a commercial trust according to the type of project and the conditions established in the bidding documents, contracts and other regulations. The tariff scheme will be determined by the Delegating Entity.

Risk distribution: the risk analysis shall be performed by the Delegating Entity in order to identify, prioritize and quantify the risks associated with the PPP project and their distribution between the Private Manager and the Delegating Entity.

Financing: the Private Manager may establish the necessary guarantees to ensure the financing of the project. The Regulation establishes the general scheme of rights of the financiers in PPP projects.

  1. PPP Project Cycle

The Regulation determines the following phases of a PPP project:

  • Planning and eligibility phase: includes the elaboration of the project profile, verification of alignment with general planning, incorporation of the project in the National PPP Registry and determination of eligibility criteria.
  • Structuring phase: includes the (i) pre-feasibility studies, which must materialize in a Preliminary Technical Report issued by the Delegating Entity with which the MEF will issue a Preliminary Sustainability and Fiscal Risks Report; (ii) feasibility and transactional stage, in which the pre-feasibility studies are concluded and adjusted, the bidding documents are formulated, the draft PPP contract, among others, with which the Delegating Entity will issue the Final Business Case; (iii) public bidding, for which the Delegating Entity will determine an award variable, these variables are related to the contributions of state resources, the remuneration to the State, the tariff level, among others; and, (iv) award of the PPP contract, from which the successful bidder will have 90 days to confirm compliance with all the necessary conditions such as the incorporation of a sole purpose company and the presentation of insurance and guarantees for the execution of the PPP contract.
  • Execution and management phase of the PPP contract: includes the provision of infrastructure and/or services object of the PPP contract, the supervision of the execution by the Delegating Entity and the articulation of coordination actions between the parties. The creation of one or more commercial trusts for the administration of all the income and expenses of the project is determined. The Private Manager must report periodically on its performance and the Delegating Entity will publish its performance reports annually in the National PPP Registry.
  • The Regulation also establishes the rules for the suspension, termination and liquidation of PPP contracts. At the end of the Contract, the assets will revert to the Delegating Entity.

Private initiative: private initiatives must be submitted within the timeframe determined by the CIAPP and always aimed at satisfying a need in accordance with the plans or policies established by the respective level of government. The proponent will assume the totality of the costs of the development of its proposal. The Delegating Entity may declare a private initiative to be of public interest or reject it for cause. If a declaration of public interest is issued, pre-feasibility studies may begin. In 2023 private initiatives may be submitted between July and September, in 2024 between January and March and between July and September.

Prequalification: The Delegating Entity may use a prequalification system when it considers that its amount or complexity could limit the number of bidders.

Dispute Resolution: the PPP contract shall provide for a tiered dispute resolution mechanism. The parties may agree that disputes of a technical nature shall be heard by a Combined Dispute Board whose decisions shall have binding effect.

Reformatory and Derogatory Provisions: the Regulation includes reformatory provisions to the General Regulation of the Organic Code of Planning and Public Finances, mostly related to the determination and management of fiscal risks. The rule that any modification to a PPP contract under execution will require the opinion of sustainability and fiscal risks issued by the MEF is maintained. The 3 Executive Decrees that regulated this matter are expressly derogated.

 

Jimmy-Rodriguez-abogados-ecuador

Specialist in Infrastructure
Jimmy Rodríguez, associate at CorralRosales
jirodriguez@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

Would you like to receive our newsletters with information like the one you have just read?
Click here and subscribe.

NOTE: The above text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not liable for any loss or damage incurred as a result of acting or failing to act on the basis of the information contained in this document. Any additional determined situation requires the specific opinion and concept of the firm in Quito / Guayaquil, Ecuador.

CORRALROSALES

Single Income Tax on Sports Betting Operators

DETAILS

DATE: 23-06-2023

PROFESSIONALS INVOLVED IN THE ARTICLE:

Andrea Moya

MEDIA:

– LexLatin

In 2011 a referendum held in Ecuador in which, among others, the following question was asked: Do you agree that businesses dedicated to gambling, such as casinos and gambling halls, should be prohibited in the country? A majority of the population voted in favor of the consultation and, consequently gambling was banned.

Following the recent creation in Ecuador of the “Single Income Tax on Sports Betting Operators”, our Partner Andrea Moya publishes an article in LexLatin analyzing this issue.

On May 17, 2023, the President of the Republic issued a Decree-Law for the Strengthening of the Family Economy and, on June 16 the Constitutional Court issued a favorable opinion.

This Decree-Law creates the “Single Income Tax on Sports Betting Operators”. The taxable event, explains Andrea, “is receiving Ecuadorian source income derived from sports betting activities carried out live, through internet or any other means”.

Andrea states in the article that the tax rate is 15% of the taxable base, and will be calculated according to the following rules:

  1. Operators with tax residence in Ecuador: The taxable base will be equal to the total income (including commissions) minus the total prizes paid in the same period. Prizes will be deducted from the taxable base if 15% of the value of the prize has been withheld by the operator.
  2. Non-resident operators: The taxable base will be equal to the total amount paid by the user in each transaction, i.e., the total value of the bets. If the bet is made through an intermediary, the intermediary must collect the tax from the user and pay it to the Internal Revenue Service.

Additionally, our Partner indicates that “the beneficiaries of the prizes will pay a 15% tax on the value of each prize received, in cash or in kind. If the price is paid by an operator located in Ecuador, the operator must withhold the tax”.

Consequently, “those users who place bets through non-resident operators, will be subject to a higher tax than those who place bets through resident operators, since, in this case, they will only pay the tax on the value of the prizes; while, in the first case they will pay a tax on the value of the prizes and on the bets”.

In the present case it is important to take into consideration that users who place bets through non-resident operators are already subject to a higher tax burden, since the value of their bets is subject to the payment of: (i) outflow tax (ISD), if the user, within each fiscal year, exceeds the tax exempt value; and, (ii) Value Added Tax (VAT).

“The Single Income Tax on Sports Betting Operators will become effective as from January 1, 2024. Therefore, the Presidency must issue the necessary rules to regulate its collection until December 31, 2023. It is to be expected that these regulations will clear, among others, the doubts raised in the preceding paragraphs”, she concludes.

If you want to read the complete article, click here.

Registered rights versus use in the market in opposition proceedings

DETALLES

FECHA: 10-05-2023

PROFESIONALES EN LA NOTICIA:

Andrea Miño

MEDIO:

– WTR

“The concept that trademark registration grants ownership of and exclusive rights to use a trademark to identify and protect the goods and services for which it was registered is accepted worldwide”.

“When the IP Office grants a trademark registration, it confers rights and obligations to the owner, including the ability to oppose a third party’s application for an identical or confusingly similar trademark. As part of the opposition proceedings, the defendant may submit evidence to refute the opponent’s allegations”, as explained by our associate Andrea Miño in an article published in WTR.

Miño recalls that “in recent years, it has become common practice for an applicant whose mark is being opposed to submit evidence demonstrating that the use of the opponent’s mark is limited to specific goods or services, in an attempt to minimise the risk of confusion between the conflicting marks”.

In some of these cases, she adds, “the IP Office considered these allegations to be valid and allowed the registration of trademarks similar to previously registered trademarks – thus erroneously applying the specialty principle, which directly affects registration rights, one of the fundamentals of trademark law. Such ex officio restriction of the goods was a clear overreach of the examiner’s powers, in violation of the trademark owner’s rights”.

Our associate analyzes a recent case examined by the Intellectual Property Office in an opposition proceeding in which an applicant downloaded content from the opponent’s website in order for the Intellectual Property Office to consider only the products offered on that website (pharmaceutical products for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure), despite the fact that the trademark on which the opposition was based was granted for pharmaceutical, among other products.

The applicant sought to obtain the registration of a confusingly similar trademark to protect other types of pharmaceuticals (medicines for respiratory diseases).

Resolution No OCDI-2023-291 sets an important precedent whereby, in opposition proceedings, the registration rights must prevail over the use of the mark in the market. The decision makes it clear that, in order to obtain the limitation of a registration, there are other legally established proceedings, which can also be used as a defence in the opposition proceedings.

If you want to read the complete article, click here.

Occupational health promotion regulation

From the 14th of May 2023, companies must implement an Occupational Health Promotion Plan, accordingly to the following considerations:
Scope:
All public or private work centers with 25 or more employees are obligated to implement the Occupational Health Promotion Plan; hereby the “Plan”.Stages:Planification: this stage requires an occupational health, security and practices evaluation as well as identifying problems and necessities. It also requires establishing activities that motivate personnel into a healthy lifestyle and work condition.

Implementation: in this stage the company must design an educational program for employees and notify the National Health Authority about the Plan implementation in the workspace for its evaluation.

Work centers must appoint a health professional as “Focal Point” to lead and form the work team that will oversee the Plan implementation.

Approval on the “Actívate y Vive” certificate: the Health Authority will issue a compliance report of the Plan and as a result the “Actívate y Vive” certificate.

Renewal: companies must request a renewal of the certificate in the dependencies appointed by the Health Authority for this purpose.

The Quality Assurance in Health Services and Prepaid Medicine Agency (ACCES) or whoever acts in its place will verify the existence of the “Actívate y Vive” certificate from December of 2023.

The “Actívate y Vive” certificate will be valid for two years and obligated companies must request its renewal four months before the expiration date.

 

Edmundo-Ramos-abogados-ecuador

Specialist in Labor Law
Edmundo Ramos, partner at CorralRosales
eramos@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

Would you like to receive our newsletters with information like the one you have just read?
Click here and subscribe.

NOTE: The above text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not liable for any loss or damage incurred as a result of acting or failing to act on the basis of the information contained in this document. Any additional determined situation requires the specific opinion and concept of the firm in Quito / Guayaquil, Ecuador.

CORRALROSALES