ADVANCE PAYMENT ON UNDISTRIBUTED PROFITS

On October 27, 2025, the President of the Republic of Ecuador issued the Law on Social Transparency Regulations. Below, we summarize the provisions regarding the Advance Payment on Undistributed Profits:

 

  1. General Regime

 

a. Calculation Formula

 

The advance payment will be calculated as follows:

 

  1. Profit (+) or loss (–) from the immediately preceding fiscal year: accounting profit or loss, minus employee profit-sharing, minus income tax expense, minus legal reserve.
  2. To this amount, the accumulated profits (+) or losses (–) from prior fiscal years (other than those mentioned above) shall be added or subtracted.
  • (–) The value of dividends distributed between January 1 and July 31 of the fiscal year in which the advance payment is determined shall be subtracted.
  1. (–) The capitalization of profits made between January 1 and July 31 of the fiscal year in which the advance payment is determined shall also be subtracted.
  2. Adjustments for income valuation under the equity method for the previous period (+/–) shall be added or subtracted.
  3. The progressive rate established in Article 39.2.1 of the Internal Tax Regime Law shall then be applied to this base to determine the amount payable.

 

b. Payment Methods and Dates

 

Taxpayers must declare and pay the applicable value in the month of August according to the ninth digit of the tax ID:

 

 

  • Special taxpayers must make the payment by the 11th day of the due month.

 

  • Payment may be deferred up to three equal installments to be paid in August, September, and October of each year.

 

  • Entities that do not exceed the exempt threshold of USD 100,000.00 are not required to file the declaration.

 

c. Offset and/or Refund for Dividend Distribution or Capitalization

 

The amount paid in advance may be offset if dividends are distributed or profits are capitalized, following this order of priority:

 

  1. Dividend Distribution:

 

  • Offset first against the withholding tax payable on dividends derived from accumulated profits.
  • If not fully offset, it may be credited against the income tax of the fiscal year in which dividends are distributed, or against income tax of other periods, within 3 years from when the credit became enforceable.
  • If not offset, the taxpayer may request a refund of the remaining balance within 3 years from the date of payment.

 

2. Capitalization:

 

  • Offset first against income tax of any fiscal year.
  • If not fully offset, a refund may be requested within three years from the date of payment.

 

Holding companies and entities subject to a single income tax regime may request the refund from the first day of the month following the capitalization or dividend distribution, for the portion of the credit not offset, within 3 years.

 

The offset or refund shall be made in the same proportion as the amount distributed and/or capitalized.

 

d. Capitalization of Profits

 

For the purpose of offsetting or refunding the advance payment due to capitalization of profits, the capitalized value must be used for any of the following activities:

 

  • Acquisition of new productive assets purchased as of August 28, 2025, such as property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, and biological assets, intended for the taxpayer’s productive or commercial process. The change of ownership of operating assets or those located abroad shall not be considered.
  • Acquisition of new inventories as of August 28, 2025, such as raw materials, supplies, intermediate goods, and finished goods forming part of the business operating cycle.
  • A net increase in employment of at least 5% compared to the fiscal year preceding the investment year. The net employment growth will be calculated as:

 

Net employment growth = (total jobs – previous jobs) / previous jobs

 

e. Non-Deductible Expense

 

Taxpayers that neither distribute nor capitalize their accumulated profits within the two fiscal years following the year in which the advance payment was made shall not be entitled to offset or request a refund. Consequently, the paid amount will become a non-deductible expense in the fiscal year when that term expires.

 

  1. Special Regime for the Advance Payment on Undistributed Profits for Fiscal Year 2025

 

f. Calculation Formula

 

To calculate the taxable base for fiscal year 2025, taxpayers will use the information included in the 2024 income tax return filed by July 31, 2025, disregarding any amended returns filed after that date:

g. Payment Methods and Dates

 

Only for the 2025 fiscal year, taxpayers must file and pay the obligation in two equal, interest-free installments during November and December, according to the following schedule:

 

First Installment:

Second Installment:

Holding companies are not subject to this payment for fiscal year 2025.

 

h. Offset and/or Refund for Dividend Distribution or Capitalization

 

For the purposes of offset or refund for fiscal years 2025 and 2026 related to profit capitalization, the acquisition of new productive assets, property, plant and equipment, biological assets, and/or inventories made during the two fiscal years immediately preceding the publication date of the Law shall be considered, provided that they are incorporated into the productive process.

 

Andrea Moya, Parner at CorralRosales
amoya@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

Mateo Bravo, Associate at CorralRosales
mbravo@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

© CORRALROSALES 2025
NOTA: EL texto anterior ha sido elaborado con fines informativos. CorralRosales no es responsable de ninguna pérdida o daño ocasionado como consecuencia de haberse actuado o dejado de actuar en base a la información contenida en este documento. Cualquier situación determinada adicional requiere la opinión y concepto específico de la firma.

CORRALROSALES

AMENDMENTS TO THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT LAW

The Law Reforming the Law on Public Procurement (“LOSNCP”) was published in the Official Gazette No. 140 on October 7, 2025.

Below is a summary of the main amendments.

  1. The concept of “best value for money” is incorporated as one of the guiding principles of public procurement.

 

  1. The LOSNCP does not apply to Public-Private Partnership (“PPP”) projects, unless expressly referred to in the relevant PPP regulations, bidding documents, or contracts.

 

  1. The National Public Procurement Service (“SERCOP”) may issue models and methodologies, but is no longer authorized to issue secondary regulations governing the National Public Procurement System.

 

  1. Inter-administrative contracts. Public contracting entities may not associate with private companies or subcontract them for more than 30% of the total contract value. Any subcontracting requires prior authorization from SERCOP.

 

  1. Electronic Catalog. Contracting entities should preferably procure goods and services listed in SERCOP’s electronic catalog (the “Electronic Catalog”).

 

  1. Electronic Reverse Auction and Bidding. The Electronic Reverse Auction shall be used when the required good or service is not listed in the Electronic Catalog and the award is based solely on the lowest price. When evaluation criteria other than price are considered, the Bidding procedure shall apply.

 

  1. Consulting services are excluded from the Electronic Catalog and must be procured through a Public Tender when the reference budget exceeds US$10,000. Contracts at or below this threshold may be awarded under the Minimal Amount (“Ínfima Cuantía”) procedure.

 

  1. Response to contractors. During contract execution, public entities must respond to contractor requests within a maximum of 10 business days from notification.

 

  1. Any penalty imposed on the contractor shall be calculated based on the value of the unfulfilled obligation.

 

  1. Payments to contractors must be made within a maximum of 2 months after fulfillment of the contractual conditions precedent.

 

  1. Termination by mutual agreement. When a contract is terminated by mutual agreement, the contracting entity may directly procure the pending obligations within 2 months from the termination date, provided that such obligations are not contracted with the same contractor.

 

  1. Administrative appeals in public procurement matters shall be governed by the provisions of the Administrative Code (“Código Orgánico Administrativo”).

 

  1. During the pre-contractual phase, a bidder may file a complaint before SERCOP if the contracting entity fails to comply with applicable regulations. SERCOP or the complainant may request suspension of the procurement process, subject to the requirements established in the forthcoming regulations to the LOSNCP.

 

  1. Audit Fines (“glosas”). Before making the final payment, contracting entities must consult the Office of the Comptroller General of the State to determine whether the contractor has any enforceable and unappealed fines (glosas). If such fines exist, the corresponding amounts shall be withheld and offset against the final payment.

 

Public procurement procedures initiated before October 7, 2025, will continue to be governed by the prior regulations.

 

The President of the Republic must issue the new regulations on the LOSNCP by November 21, 2025.

Hugo García Larriva, Partner at CorralRosales
hgarcia@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

Mario Fernández, Associate CorralRosales
mfernandez@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

© CORRALROSALES 2025
NOTA: EL texto anterior ha sido elaborado con fines informativos. CorralRosales no es responsable de ninguna pérdida o daño ocasionado como consecuencia de haberse actuado o dejado de actuar en base a la información contenida en este documento. Cualquier situación determinada adicional requiere la opinión y concepto específico de la firma.

CORRALROSALES

The strategic role of bad faith and notoriety in nullity actions against confusingly similar trademarks

  • A recent resolution provides insights into how the grounds of bad faith and notoriety are applied in practice
  • The IP Office requires a solid evidentiary foundation, especially for complex arguments such as bad faith and notoriety
  • Obtaining a declaration of notoriety through a specific proceeding is a crucial
    step when seeking to rely on notoriety

Background

The Ecuadorian IP system has increasingly emphasised the protection of fair competition and good faith in trademark registration. While litigants traditionally base nullity actions on confusing similarity, the strategic application of the grounds of bad faith and notoriety isgaining significant importance in administrative jurisprudence. A recent resolution from theIP Office provides valuable insight into how these concepts are being applied in practice.

The JEAN BOOK case

Case OCDI-2022-217-AN involved a relative nullity action based on the graphicalsimilarity of the contested mark with the earlier registered mark JEAN BOOK. The earliermark had been declared well known in Colombia. The plaintiff also argued that thecontested trademark had been registered in bad faith, constituting an act of unfaircompetition.

The resolution demonstrates the thoroughness with which the IP Office examined theallegations of bad faith and notoriety. While the plaintiff cited the notoriety of its mark inColombia as a central argument, the IP Office did not immediately accept this claim.Instead, it requested that the plaintiff bring a notoriety declaration proceeding in Ecuador.This highlights an important legal point: administrative authorities in Ecuador mustofficially declare a mark’s notoriety through a specific proceeding. This step is crucial forany legal strategy that seeks to use notoriety as a basis for a nullity action.

Bad faith is a legitimate ground for invalidating a registered trademark. In this case, theplaintiff successfully demonstrated bad faith. The defendant had initially offered goodsidentified by the mark ESTILO DENIM + GRÁFICA DE FIBRA. The owner of the JEANBOOK mark sent a cease and desist letter, asserting infringement based on thereproduction of a graphic element of its mark – namely, a denim fabric texture. Thedefendant acknowledged the infringement and committed to removing the goods from themarket. Despite this commitment, the defendant continued to file applications for severalnew marks that reproduced the core graphic element and overall concept of the JEANBOOK mark. This demonstrated the defendant’s prior knowledge of the notorious earliermark, which clearly indicated bad faith.

The resolution also included a comparative analysis of the conflicting marks, which is acritical step in any nullity action. The IP Office assessed the existence of a family of marks,to which the contested mark allegedly belonged. However, the IP Office rejected thisargument, stating that marks must be previously registered to form a family. Additionally,the IP Office concluded that, although the marks ESTILO DENIM + GRÁFICA DE FIBRA andJEAN BOOK did not share phonetic or orthographic similarities, they did share graphic andconceptual similarities.

Comment

The resolution underscores that the analysis should prioritise similarities over differences.It serves as a clear guide for the challenges and requirements involved in substantiating anullity action in Ecuador. The IP Office, in line with Andean jurisprudence, demands a solidevidentiary foundation, especially for complex arguments such as bad faith and notoriety.Mere allegations of a mark’s notoriety or bad faith are insufficient.

This case further highlights that a successful legal strategy goes beyond simpleaccusations; it requires robust documentary evidence and meticulous legal analysis to
safeguard legitimate IP rights.

Andrea Miño
Associate at CorralRosales
andrea@corralrosales.com 

SUSPENSION OF WORKDAY – OCTOBER 9, 2025

On October 2, 2025, through Executive Decree No. 172, the president of the Republic, Daniel Noboa, ordered the suspension of the workday corresponding to Thursday, October 9, 2025, for both the public and private sectors. Consequently, the national holiday for Guayaquil Independence Day will extend from October 9 to October 12, 2025.

The workday will not be recoverable.

Edmundo Ramos, partner at CorralRosales
eramos@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

María Victoria Beltrán, Associate at CorralRosales
mbeltran@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

© CORRALROSALES 2025
NOTA: EL texto anterior ha sido elaborado con fines informativos. CorralRosales no es responsable de ninguna pérdida o daño ocasionado como consecuencia de haberse actuado o dejado de actuar en base a la información contenida en este documento. Cualquier situación determinada adicional requiere la opinión y concepto específico de la firma.

CORRALROSALES