Tag Archives: Ecuador

CorralRosales > Ecuador

Operation of emergency generating sets

Posted on

On September 8, 2024, the Electricity Regulation and Control Agency (“ARCONEL”) issued Regulation No. ARCONEL-003/24 titled “Technical-Commercial Operation of Emergency Generating Sets under Conditions of Generation Deficit and Electricity Rationing in the National Interconnected System (S.N.I)” (hereinafter referred to as the “Regulation”).

The Regulation sets out the technical and commercial conditions that regulated and non-regulated consumers who own generating sets must meet if they wish to participate in the supply of electricity during periods of generation deficit or rationing declared by the National Electricity Operator (“CENACE”).

The key aspects of the Regulation are detailed below:

  • Requirements

The emergency generating set (“GEE”) must have a minimum nominal power of 100 kW. The maximum capacity will be determined by the respective electricity distribution and commercialization company (“Distributor”). Additionally, it must be equipped with an hour meter to record operating hours.

The Regulation prohibits the use of subsidized diesel for the operation of the GEE. Therefore, the owner of the GEE must purchase fuel as provided in Resolution No. ARCERNNR-020/2020 or any resolution that replaces it.

  • Qualification Process

To implement this scheme, the owner of the GEE must qualify as an emergency generator (“Emergency Generator”) by following this procedure:

  1. Submit the qualification application to the Distributor in their service area.
  2. The Distributor will conduct a physical inspection of the applicant’s facilities.
  3. If the inspection is favorable, the Distributor will issue a report and grant the Emergency Generator Qualification Certificate (“Qualification Certificate”).

Upon completion of this process, the Emergency Generator may operate the GEE during periods of generation deficit or rationing declared by CENACE.

  • Benefits for Emergency Generators

Emergency Generators will receive financial compensation for the energy generated by the GEE, which will be determined monthly by ARCONEL.

If the Emergency Generator is a regulated consumer, the compensation will be applied to the amount on the invoice issued by the Distributor for the public electricity service. If the GEE produces more energy than consumed from the distribution grid, credit notes will be issued in favor of the Emergency Generator.

If the Emergency Generator is a non-regulated consumer (for self-consumption or large consumers), the energy generated by the GEE will be allocated to the Distributors and credited in favor of the respective self-generator or generator. Subsequently, the self-generator or generator must invoice this energy to the Emergency Generator at the same price as agreed in the private power purchase agreement (“PPA”) between the parties.

Lastly, it is established that electricity distribution companies must conduct quarterly informational campaigns through various media channels for private individuals or entities that own generating sets, encouraging them to qualify as Emergency Generators. Additionally, they must keep the information updated in the Strategic Information Management System (“SISDAT”), for which they are required to maintain a registry of the institutions and GEE.

carlos-torres

Carlos Torres, Senior Associate at CorralRosales
ctorres@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

 

Mario Fernández, Associate at CorralRosales
mfernandez@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

© CORRALROSALES 2024
NOTE: The above text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not responsible for any loss or damage caused by actions taken or not taken based on the information contained in this document. Any specific situation requires the specific opinion and advice of the firm.

CORRALROSALES

Amendments to the Household Goods and Work Equipment Customs Regime.

Posted on

Resolution No. SENAE-SENAE-2024-0083-RE issued by the Customs Authority (SENAE) on July 31, 2024, amended the regulations for the import of goods under the exception regime for household goods and work equipment.

The most important points include:

  1. Eligible goods

The list of new or used household articles that are eligible for import under the household effects regime was updated:

 

Household goods Eligible quantity Bedroom set One per household member plus an additional set. Dining set One per household. Living groom set and its accessories One per household member plus an additional backyard furniture set. Kitchen Stove  

 

 

 

 

One per household. The quantity may increase depending on the goods.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Refrigerator / freezer / wine cooler Microwave Oven or similar Dishwasher Range hood Kitchen Cabinet Grill or similar Water dispenser Water purifying filters Washing machine Clothes dryer Projector Home theater system Speaker or audio system Electric doorbell (intercom)  

 

One per household. The quantity may increase depending on the goods. Baby monitor intercom Home surveillance system Lawn mower or weed trimmer Vacuum cleaner Floor polisher for home usage Garbage disposal unit Audio or video recorder  

 

 

 

 

 

One per household. Video player Video game console Gym machines Bicycle Video recorder Camera Television Landline phone Desktop computer Computer peripheral Printer Fireplace, outdoor heater or heater Air conditioner unit Alcoholic beverages Up to 50 liters in total and 2 liters for each commercial brand. Clothing, footwear, and accessories Up to 200 kilograms for each household member. Vehicle (only for Ecuadorian returning migrants) Its value can’t exceed 80 times the minimum wage (US$36,800) Motorbike (only for Ecuadorian returning migrants) Its value can’t exceed 25 times the minimum wage (US$11,500).

Goods not included in the list will be eligible as long as they are used for personal purposes and not for commercial purposes.

  1. Study trip

Ecuadorian citizens who have left the country for educational purposes can only import one motorcycle into the country. These types of migrants are not allowed to import vehicles unless they have resided abroad after ending their studies.

  1. Articles restricted under work equipment regime.

The following items are added to the list of articles that are restricted to be imported as work equipment: raw materials, supplies, textiles, footwear, weapons, explosives, flares, fireworks, and any other items subject to Armed Forces regulations.

  1. Late arrival

If a household member arrives in the country 6 months after the date of acceptance of the customs import declaration, the customs authority will determine the difference to be paid for foreign trade taxes.

  1. Penalties

If the imported goods are not properly identified or do not match with the data registered in the list of goods subject to the exception regime, the returning migrant or foreigner will be subject to the payment of a fine of 50% of the minimum wage (US$ 230,00 for fiscal year 2024), according to the article 193 of the Customs Regulation Law.

The full text is available on the following link:

https://www.aduana.gob.ec/gacnorm/data/2024/08/01/11/SENAE-SENAE-2024-0083-RE.pdf

© CORRALROSALES 2024
NOTE: The above text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not responsible for any loss or damage caused by actions taken or not taken based on the information contained in this document. Any specific situation requires the specific opinion and advice of the firm.

CORRALROSALES

Resolution No. SPDP-SPDP-2024-0002-R

Posted on

Resolution No. SPDP-SPDP-2024-0002-R (“Resolution”), published in the Official Gazette No. 640 on September 10, 2024, the Data Protection Authority (“SPDP” or “Authority”) issued the “Mandatory Technical Guide for the Registration of the Attorney-in-fact designated by Controllers, whether acting individually or jointly, and Processors that engage in Data Processing Activities in the Republic of Ecuador” (“Guide”).

The following are highlighted:

  1. The Guide is mandatory for all controllers and processors who, although not domiciled in Ecuador, offer goods or services to residents of the country, are part of the personal data protection system, or control the behavior of data subjects to the extent that such control occurs within the territory (“Regulated Entities”).
  2. The Regulated Entities must designate an attorney-in-fact (“Attorney-in-fact”) on a permanent basis. The Attorney-in-fact must be vested with broad faculties to represent them before administrative and judicial bodies on data protection matters. In addition, the Attorney-in-fact must handle requests or complaints from data subjects without limitations that could affect their rights.
  3. The power of attorney must detail the commercial name and the brands identifying the foreign controller in the market. Foreign processors must also detail information regarding the controllers for whom they process data. Both controllers and processors must provide their addresses and telephone numbers for their offices and those of their Attorney-in-fact designated in Ecuador.
  4. In case of non-compliance with these obligations, the individuals or entities who, under certain circumstances, appear to act on behalf of the Regulated Entities may be held administratively liable. The Authority may impose and apply corrective measures established in the Data Protection Law and its Regulations.
  5. The Attorney-in-fact can be an individual or a legal entity domiciled in Ecuador. If the Attorney-in-fact is an individual, they must be Ecuadorian or, if foreign, a resident in the country with full political rights. When the Attorney-in-fact is an entity, its corporate purpose must allow it to act as Attorney-in-fact. The SPDP may verify with the Superintendence of Companies that the entity meets its obligations, and that the appointment of the legal representative is valid.
  6. Regulated entities must register their Attorney-in-fact with the SPDP by presenting the document granting the power of attorney. If the power of attorney is granted abroad, it must be apostilled or certified by an Ecuadorian diplomatic agent. Powers of attorney in a foreign language must be translated into Spanish.
  7. The SPDP will verify that the power of the Attorney-in-fact meets the Guide’s requirements and assess whether the power of attorney granted is adequate and sufficient. If it is approved, registration will proceed, and the Regulated Entity will be notified. The registration of the Attorney-in-fact, along with their contact details, will be published on the SPDP’s website and that of the Regulated Entities to facilitate the exercise of data subjects’ rights.
  8. The Regulated Entities must update their Attorney-in-fact registration in the following cases: a) death; b) resignation; c) expiration of the power of attorney, if applicable; d) change in the denomination, absorption, split, transformation, dissolution, or liquidation of the entity designated as the Attorney-in-fact. Except for the death of the Attorney-in-fact, the registered Attorney-in-fact will continue to be liable before the SPDP and the data subjects until the registration is updated.
  9. All controllers and processors performing data processing abroad must present the following to the Authority:
    • The co-responsibility or data processing agreement.
    • The Record of Processing Activities (ROPA).
    • Risk analysis for each processing activity.
    • Dataflow of personal data for each processing activity.
    • Security measures implemented for data transfers.
    • Self-regulation codes, if any, must be approved by the Authority.

Transitional provisions of the Resolution establish the following:

  1. Regulated Entities engaged in processing activities since September 6, 2024, are granted a six-month period from the issuance of the Guide to comply with the registration of their Attorney-in-fact.
  2. The Authority will initiate the corresponding administrative control processes if an Attorney-in-fact is not registered within the period.
  3. The application for registration of the Attorney-in-fact must be submitted in person at the Authority’s office.

 

Rafael-Serrano-abogados-ecuador

Rafael Serrano, Partner at CorralRosales
rserrano@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

© CORRALROSALES 2024
NOTE: The above text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not responsible for any loss or damage caused by actions taken or not taken based on the information contained in this document. Any specific situation requires the specific opinion and advice of the firm.

CORRALROSALES

Resolution No. JPRM – 2024 – 018 – M

Posted on

Resolution No. JPRM-2024-018-M (“Resolution”), issued on September 4, 2024, by the Monetary Policy and Regulation Board (“JPRM”), enacted the “Regulation governing payment methods, systems and fintech activities in Ecuador.”

The Resolution, which replaces Resolution No. JPRM-2023-014-M (“Repealed Resolution””) introduces necessary reforms to ensure the application of the Law for the Development, Regulation, and Control of Technological Financial Services – Fintech Law.

The Resolution generally maintains the content of the Repealed Resolution; however, it introduces the following reforms:

  1. It modifies the concept of electronic wallets, establishing that these are payment methods that, through a technological application or online service on an electronic device, allow users to make payments, collections, and transfers and send and receive financial remittances in real-time.
  2. It defines the processing of electronic payment methods as the service provided by auxiliary service entities to banks, credit unions, and mutual savings and loan associations to process payment methods that allow their clients or members to make payments, collections, and transfers.
  3. It establishes that auxiliary financial service entities specifically authorized to provide electronic payment methods may operate electronic wallets.
  4. It establishes that fintech entities providing digital credits may also participate in the Auxiliary Payment Systems. Thus, the following are recognized as participants of the Auxiliary Payment Systems (“Participants”): financial entities, auxiliary service entities of the financial system (transactional, payment, network, and ATM services, and card administrators), fintech entities (neobanks and digital credit providers), specialized electronic deposit and payment companies (“SEDPES”), and Auxiliary Payment System Administrators (“ASAP”).
  5. It establishes that Clients shall be considered those natural or legal persons who enter a contractual relationship to use services offered by a Participant, whereas Users shall be those who utilize the services without having a contractual relationship with the Participant.
  6. It introduces the obligation for the Central Bank of Ecuador (“BCE”) to keep the registry of Participants updated and published, which will include details of the services each Participant provides.
  7. It establishes that Participants must allow Users to customize their maximum transaction amounts and implement due diligence controls and policies related to the frequency of daily payments they can execute.
  8. It introduces the obligation for Participants to inform Users about existing security measures and the available channels for resolving claims related to such events. Participants must ensure the privacy and security of the information provided by Users.
  9. The services that Participants may provide have been reformed and are now categorized according to the following: payment aggregation, payment gateway, electronic payment processing, transactional switch for payment services, money remittances, collection of public resources, and clearing.
  10. The Central Bank of Ecuador (BCE) must respond to Participants’ requests for operational authorization within 30 days. Furthermore, the process for terminating the administrative act by which the operational authorization is granted is established.
  11. The services that SEDPES may offer are expanded to include sending remittances and services established for Participants, which they can provide exclusively to their clients.
  12. The Superintendence of Banks is no longer required to issue a license or authorization for SEDPES activities.

General provisions of the Resolution establish the following:

  1. The reserve requirements for SEDPES must be met within three months of the operational authorization’s issuance.
  2. The BCE will notify the Office of the Attorney General of individuals or entities engaging in activities regulated by the Resolution without the corresponding authorization.
  3. All individuals or legal entities with a Tax Identification Number must offer their customers at least one electronic payment channel.
  4. The operational authorizations issued by the BCE to SEDPES or ASAP will be notified to the Superintendence of Banks and the Superintendence of Popular and Solidarity Economy for their knowledge.
  5. In-person transactions with credit, debit, prepaid cards, or electronic wallets must be conducted in the customer’s presence. To this end, establishments must ensure that the point-of-sale (POS) device is in a position that allows the customer to observe the insertion, swipe, or tap of the card.
  6. A license from the Superintendence of Banks will only be required in cases determined by the JPRM.

Within two months, the BCE will have to adjust existing regulations to incorporate provisions of the Resolution.

Within six months, the BCE will review the services provided by qualified Participants and classify them by the provisions of the Resolution.

 

Juan Fernando Riera, Associate at CorralRosales
jriera@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

© CORRALROSALES 2024
NOTE: The above text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not responsible for any loss or damage caused by actions taken or not taken based on the information contained in this document. Any specific situation requires the specific opinion and advice of the firm.

CORRALROSALES

Ecuadorian Government Launches Tender for Electrical Interconnection with Peru

Posted on

Through Press Bulletin No. 70 dated September 2, 2024, the Ecuadorian government, through the Ministry of Energy and Mines (“MEM”) and the Ecuadorian Electricity Corporation (“CELEC EP”), announced an international public tender for the development of several projects involving the construction of civil works, supply of materials, equipment, electromechanical assembly, testing, and commissioning of the 500-kilovolt (kV) Electric Interconnection System between Peru and Ecuador (the “Project”).

The tender is divided into two blocks:

  • Lot 1: The Pasaje Substation at 500/230 Kv and the expansion of the Chorrillos Substation at 500 Kv, with a reference value of approximately USD 80 million.
  • Lot 2: The Chorrillos – Pasaje Transmission Line at 500 Kv (206.97 km), the Pasaje – Border Transmission Line (500 Kv) spanning 77.88 km, and the sectioning of the Minas San Francisco – San Ildefonso Transmission Line at 230 Kv, with a reference value of USD 184 million.

All civil works, material supply, equipment, electromechanical assembly, testing, and commissioning of the Electric Interconnection System are expected to be completed by April 2026.

According to the schedule established by MEM, all bids must be submitted by Friday, September 22, and will be evaluated by December 2024. Contract signing will take place between January and March 2025. Finally, the Project is expected to begin operations between June and August 2026.

The Project will be financed by international banks and the Ecuadorian state. The Inter-American Development Bank (“IDB”) will finance 43%, and the European Investment Bank (“EIB”) will cover another 43%. The remaining 14% will be financed by CELEC EP. The Project already has the Environmental License, granted by the Ministry of the Environment, Water, and Ecological Transition (“MAATE”), a document necessary for obtaining financing and executing the required works.

This Project is part of the Master Electricity Plan, which considers international interconnection as a mechanism for energy exchange based on commercial agreements and regulatory frameworks for regional integration.

carlos-torres

Carlos Torres, Senior Associate at CorralRosales
ctorres@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

© CORRALROSALES 2024
NOTE: The above text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not responsible for any loss or damage caused by actions taken or not taken based on the information contained in this document. Any specific situation requires the specific opinion and advice of the firm.

CORRALROSALES

Protection and processing of sensitive and confidential data in medical-occupational contexts

Posted on

On July 11, 2024, the Constitutional Court issued Ruling 59-19-IN/24 (the “Ruling”), declaring Ministerial Agreement 0341-2019, titled “Application of Occupational Medical Records” (the “Agreement”), unconstitutional. The Court found that the Agreement and its related forms violated privacy and personal data protection rights.

From the Ruling, we highlight the following:

  • The Constitutional Court reviewed whether the State’s actions had a legitimate aim and whether the Agreement met the requirements of proportionality, suitability, and necessity when limiting workers’ rights to privacy and data protection.
  • The Ruling determined that there is no proportionality between the constitutionally valid aim and the challenged regulation, as it is contradictory and inappropriate to require workers to provide sensitive data (such as sexual orientation, gender identity, and religion).
  • Based on these grounds, considering that the Agreement creates an illegitimate limitation on workers’ rights, and given that this information is not directly related to the performance of the worker’s duties or the specific needs of the job, the Constitutional Court declared the Agreement unconstitutional.
  • From the publication of the Ruling in the Official Gazette (which has not occurred as of the date of this bulletin) and until the adoption of new regulations on the application and management of Occupational Medical Records, occupational physicians, public or private entities, as well as the national health authority, will not be able to request workers to provide data related to sexual orientation and gender identity. Data concerning religious beliefs will be optional.

 

Rafael-Serrano-abogados-ecuador

Rafael Serrano, Partner at CorralRosales
rserrano@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

María Victoria Beltrán, Senior Associate at CorralRosales
mbeltran@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

© CORRALROSALES 2024
DISCLAIMER: The previous text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not responsible for any loss or damage caused because of having acted or stopped acting based on the information contained in this document. Any additional determined situation requires the specific opinion and concept of the firm.

CORRALROSALES

Resolution on Organic Statute of Organizational Management by Start-up Processes of the Superintendence for the Protection of Personal Data (SPDP)

Posted on

Resolution No. SPDP-SPDP-2024-0001-R introduces the Organic Statute of Organizational Management by Start-up Processes in the SPDP, hereinafter referred to as the “Statute”. This Resolution, effective as of August 2, 2024, establishes the basis for efficient and transparent management of the Institution.

What are the key aspects of the Statute?

Flexibility in Structure The Statute allows for future modifications in processes, products, and administrative units according to implementation and deconcentration needs. Process Management The SPDP will optimize its activities and resources, focusing on achieving its goals more efficiently and effectively. Managerial Positions The Quartermasters, General Coordinators and Directors are freely appointed and removable. Continuous Improvement Continuous evaluation and improvement of processes is promoted, ensuring adaptation to changes and the pursuit of excellence in management. Transparency Management by processes will facilitate access to information and accountability, strengthening institutional transparency. Demand for Services and Products The Financial Administrative Directorate shall submit a report detailing the services and products that the SPDP will need within 180 days. The corresponding authorities must approve this report.

What does the approval of the Statute imply?

Approval of the Statutes implies that the SPDP can perform its role as a technical supervisory, audit, intervention, and control body. This includes issuing decisions, monitoring compliance with the law, investigating complaints and applying sanctions in the event of non-compliance.

What is the organizational structure?

The organizational structure is divided into three processes:

  • Governing Processes: They are responsible for the direction and control of the institution, establishing guidelines, policies, and strategic plans.
  • Substantive Processes: They conduct the essential activities to provide services and fulfill the SPDP’s mission, such as the supervision, regulation, and control of the processing of personal data.
  • Adjective Processes: Provide support to the other processes, including legal advice, planning, and administrative and financial management.

In summary, the structure is divided as follows:

Type of Process Level Unit Responsible Governance Management Strategic Management Superintendent for the Protection of Personal Data Substantive Operational General Intendancy for Technological Innovation and Personal Data Security General General Intendant for Technological Innovation and Personal Data Security General Substantive Operational General Intendancy for the Regulation of Personal Data Protection General Intendant for the Regulation of Personal Data Protection Substantive Operational General Intendancy for Control and Sanctions General Intendant for Control and Sanctions Adjectives Advisory Directorate of Legal Advisory Services Director of Legal Advisory Services Adjectives Advisory Planning and Strategic Management Unit Planning and Strategic Management Specialist Adjectives Support Financial Administrative Management Financial Administrative Director

In conclusion, the approval of the Organic Statute of the Superintendence of Personal Data Protection marks a crucial milestone in data protection in Ecuador. From now on, the SPDP has the necessary structure and mechanisms to ensure compliance with the Organic Law on Personal Data Protection and its Regulations. This means that companies must comply, diligent and transparent in the handling of personal information, thus guaranteeing the privacy and security of the data of their clients, employees, and users.

 

Rafael-Serrano-abogados-ecuador

Rafael Serrano, Partner at CorralRosales
rserrano@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

© CORRALROSALES 2024
DISCLAIMER: The previous text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not responsible for any loss or damage caused as a result of having acted or stopped acting based on the information contained in this document. Any additional determined situation requires the specific opinion and concept of the firm.

 

CORRALROSALES

Declaration and payment of self-withholdings applicable to Large Taxpayers

Posted on

Through Resolution NAC-DGERCGC24-00000030, the Internal Revenue Service regulated the declaration and payment of income tax self-withholdings applicable to large taxpayers:

  1. Self-Withholdings Declaration: Self-withholdings must be declared monthly using the “Minimum Advance Payment of Income Tax and Self-Withholdings of Large Taxpayers Form”. This form will be used from August to declare the amounts payable for the month of July.
  2. Outflow Tax (ISD) Credit Notes: Outflow Tax credit notes may be used to fully or partially offset the amount payable for self-withholdings applicable to large taxpayers settled monthly, within the validity period of such notes.
  3. Exception Credit Notes: Exception credit notes may be used to fully or partially offset the amount payable for self-withholdings applicable to large taxpayers settled monthly, within the validity period of such notes.

 

Andrea Moya, Partner at CorralRosales
amoya@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

© CORRALROSALES 2024
DISCLAIMER: The previous text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not responsible for any loss or damage caused as a result of having acted or stopped acting based on the information contained in this document. Any additional determined situation requires the specific opinion and concept of the firm.

 

CORRALROSALES

SENADI protects widely recognised unregistered trademarks

Posted on

DETAILS

DATE: 03-07-2024

PROFESSIONALS INVOLVED IN THE ARTICLE:

–Andrea Miño

MEDIA:

– WTR

  • SENADI has declared the nullity of the mark SAVOY TORONTO on the ground that the application had been filed in bad faith
  • The applicant had full knowledge of the prestige of the SAVOY and TORONTO marks and of their original owner
  • The mark was applied for to take advantage of the original owner’s positioning and prestige

The Ecuadorian IP Office (SENADI), in a significant move that aligns local practice with Andean jurisprudence in recent prejudicial interpretations, has declared the nullity of a trademark that is widely recognised by consumers in different jurisdictions, and was registered in Ecuador by a party other than its legitimate owner. 

Background

The IP offices of the Andean Community member states, which play a pivotal role in safeguarding trademark rights, may declare – either ex officio or at the request of an interested party – the nullity of a trademark registration when it has been granted in contravention of the absolute or relative grounds set forth by the law. This includes the infringement of third-party rights, bad faith and unfair competition. 

In 2021 SENADI granted the registration of a trademark composed of two marks, SAVOY and TORONTO, in Class 30. These trademarks had been previously registered abroad and are fully recognised based on their business origin (Nestlé). The applicant purchased the original products in his own country and sold them in Ecuador under the trademark SAVOY TORONTO. He had been aware of the Toronto and Savoy products and their business origin for several decades, since they are widely known and favoured in several countries, including Venezuela (the applicant’s birthplace).

Decision

Community jurisprudence states that, to prove the existence of bad faith in trademark applications or registrations, the plaintiff must prove that the applicant/owner had prior knowledge of the trademark and demonstrate, at least, the existence of a contractual relationship between the parties. Although there was no contractual relationship in this case, the facts and evidence confirmed that the applicant had full knowledge of the prestige of the SAVOY and TORONTO trademarks and of their original owner. 

SENADI also analysed when the original trademark owner offered its products in Ecuador before the application. It concluded that the mark was applied for to take advantage of the owner’s positioning and prestige, and to obtain exclusive rights over the mark to prevent third parties (including the legitimate owner) from offering and marketing them in the Ecuadorian territory.

In Resolution No OCDI-2024-202 (26 March 2024), SENADI considered that the existence of bad faith had been established and issued a resolution declaring that the trademark was null. The original trademark owner had offered the Savoy and Toronto products since 2018, three years before registration was applied for.

In addition to the broad knowledge of the TORONTO and SAVOY trademarks recognised by SENADI, the resolution was also based on the fact that the marks identify a particular business origin (Nestlé).

Comment

SENADI, through Resolution No OCDI-2024-202, not only acknowledged but also underscored the severity of the trademark infringement in this case. SENADI found that the applicant sought to take undue and unjustified advantage of the prestige of Nestlé’s trademarks, qualifying the case as an act of unfair competition aiming to confuse consumers as to the origin of the products.

The resolution constitutes a strong precedent against actions that may damage trademark holders’ rights. Trademarks with a wide recognition may be registered by third parties seeking to obtain an undue advantage, which is contrary to good faith and competition.

Read the article in WTR here.

This article first appeared in WTR Daily, part of World Trademark Review, in (July 2024). For further information, please go to www.worldtrademarkreview.com.

Ruling 878-20-JP/24 – Maternity leave in cases of death of children

Posted on

On March 11, 2024, The Constitutional Court issued the ruling 878-20-JP/24, which analyzes the Maternity Leave in case of death of children, from which we highlight:

  • The Court analyzes the scope of maternity leave, with the premise that pregnant women have the right to prioritized protection and care of their integral health during pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum.
  • The postpartum or puerperium is the stage in which the body progressively recovers from the physical and psychological changes that have occurred, to return to its pre-pregnancy condition. This varies for each person.
  • The Court concludes that it is not appropriate to suspend maternity leave due to the death of the newborn child, based on the argument that the reason for the leave has disappeared ignoring the need for the woman’s recovery.
  • It argues that suspending maternity leave on the assumption that its sole purpose is to care for the children, would perpetuate the gender stereotype that assigns to women the role of primary caregiver in the family nucleus. And resolves that every working woman has the right to the full enjoyment of her maternity leave, despite the death of her child.

 

María Victoria Beltrán, Senior Associate at CorralRosales
mbeltran@corralrosales.com
+593 2 2544144

© CORRALROSALES 2024
DISCLAIMER: The previous text has been prepared for informational purposes. CorralRosales is not responsible for any loss or damage caused as a result of having acted or stopped acting based on the information contained in this document. Any additional determined situation requires the specific opinion and concept of the firm.

 

CORRALROSALES

1 2 3 … 29